Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Rage in Brazil

Mass protests erupt in the biggest cities of Brazil.  Slideshow 

Photo

The Afghan Army

The many faces of the Afghan National Army, which has taken over security of the country from NATO.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Saudi demands YouTube block access to anti-Islam film

Related Topics

An Afghan woman browses the YouTube website at a public internet cafe in Kabul September 12, 2012. REUTERS/Mohammad Ismail

An Afghan woman browses the YouTube website at a public internet cafe in Kabul September 12, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Mohammad Ismail

RIYADH | Wed Sep 19, 2012 6:06am EDT

RIYADH (Reuters) - Saudi Arabia has threatened to block all access to YouTube inside the kingdom unless the site cuts local access to a film which mocks the Prophet Mohammad, state news agency SPA reported late on Tuesday.

YouTube owner Google Inc. has already blocked access to the film in Egypt, Libya, India and Indonesia after deadly protests in several countries, but it has rejected a request by the White House to pull it from the site altogether.

"In implementation of the directives of King Abdullah... (the regulator) contacted Google to block all electronic YouTube links containing the film and in the case of a failure to respond to this request, the regulator will block all access to YouTube (in Saudi Arabia)," a government statement carried by SPA said.

It was still possible to view a clip of the film on YouTube early on Wednesday inside the conservative Islamic kingdom.

The statement said internet service providers in Saudi Arabia had also been asked to block access to the film.

In the United Arab Emirates, the Telecommunication and Regulatory Authority (TRA) said on Monday on its Twitter feed that access to the film has been blocked and asked residents to report if there are any links to the video that are still accessible.

Saudi Arabia, which holds influence over the world's 1.6 billion Muslims through its guardianship of Mecca and Medina, last week condemned both the film and the violent response against American embassies.

The film "Innocence of Muslims", clips of which were posted on the Internet, portrays the Prophet Mohammad as a womaniser and has provoked an outcry among Muslims and triggered violent attacks on embassies across North Africa and the Middle East.

For many Muslims, any depiction of the Prophet is blasphemous and caricatures or other characterisations have in the past provoked violent protests across the Muslim world.

Four U.S. officials including the ambassador to Libya were killed in the east Libyan city of Benghazi last Tuesday after anger over the film boiled over.

At least 17 people have been killed in the violence, which prompted Washington to send troops to bolster security at its missions.

The official Saudi position was echoed on Saturday by the kingdom's Grand Mufti, its most senior religious authority, who denounced attacks on embassies as un-Islamic but also called on foreign governments to outlaw insults against religions.

(Reporting By Angus McDowall; Additional reporting by Rania El Gamal in Dubai; editing by Jason Neely)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Free_Pacific wrote:
If they want to ban any criticism of religion in the West, then as a compromise, lets also ban the affirmation of belief.

The idea, that someone can come to my house and tell me that there IS a god and I am going to burn in hell. But, in response I can’t say that there is NO god and Muhammad and Jesus were just men, is just plain repugnant.

Sep 19, 2012 6:33am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.