Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Behind closed doors, Romney gossips, imitates Kissinger

U.S. Republican presidential nominee and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney speaks at campaign fundraiser in Dallas, Texas September 18, 2012. REUTERS/Jim Young

U.S. Republican presidential nominee and former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney speaks at campaign fundraiser in Dallas, Texas September 18, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Jim Young

WASHINGTON | Tue Sep 18, 2012 9:17pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The surreptitious video recording of a fundraiser held for Republican Mitt Romney in May provided a rare glimpse of how he views supporters of President Barack Obama - as government dependents.

It also provided an equally novel sight of a relaxed Romney doing an impression of Henry Kissinger, dishing about late-night television talk show host David Letterman, and receiving some pointed tips for his presidential campaign.

"I saw Dr. Kissinger," Romney says on the video, recounting a meeting in New York with the former U.S. secretary of state. "I said to him, 'How are we perceived around the world?' And he said one word: 'Veak!'"

The secretly filmed recording, released in its entirety by the liberal Mother Jones magazine on Tuesday, opened a window on how Romney acts during the kind of private meeting with donors that is helping to propel the most expensive presidential campaign in U.S. history.

In this case the former Massachusetts governor and private equity executive was speaking to donors who paid $50,000 each for the privilege of his company at a private dinner at the Boca Raton, Florida, home of financier Marc Leder.

Family and friends often say that Romney, who can be awkward while campaigning, is at ease and funny when the cameras are off— or believed to be.

"You're not eating," Romney scolded one attendee during his remarks at the fundraiser.

"I'm mesmerized," the donor said.

"He's bored to tears," Romney said to laughter.

At one point, Romney decided to give the donor a lesson in eating.

"You take this, your fork, and you put it in," Romney said.

When asked about Democrats' criticisms of his tenure as a wealthy executive at Bain Capital, Romney pretended to plead poverty.

"I'm poor as a church mouse," said Romney, who has an estimated fortune of $250 million.

NOT UP FOR 'SLAPSTICK'

Romney also gossiped about CBS late-night talk show host David Letterman, a frequent critic of the Republican. Romney said he preferred Jay Leno, host of NBC's "The Tonight Show with Jay Leno."

"Letterman hates me because I've been on Leno more than him. They are very jealous of each other, you know," Romney said.

By coincidence, a few hours after the video's release online, Obama arrived in New York City to tape an interview with Letterman.

Romney said he turned down an appearance on NBC's "Saturday Night Live" because visiting the show "has the potential of looking slapstick and not presidential."

Days before the election in 2008, Republican presidential candidate John McCain and his running mate, Sarah Palin, flew to New York to be on the show.

'ISLAMICS DO NOT WANT TO VOTE FOR YOU'

At the Florida fundraiser, Romney's comments were captured by a videocamera that had been placed on what appeared to be a marble bar.

Waiters wearing white gloves were seen serving the guests red wine from decanters. For most of the video, only the backs of donors' heads can be seen, with Romney in profile.

The audio does, however, pick up donors' comments to Romney, including some good-natured ribbing about his image on the campaign trail.

"They say, 'He's a rich boy,'" one donor affably told Romney during the dinner.

The comments reflected donors' anxieties about Romney's perceived deficiencies.

One donor complained of the difficulties of converting Obama supporters to Romney's side.

"Right now I'm very concerned," she said. "Women do not want to vote for you. Islamics, the majority, do not want to vote for you. College students don't."

"Why don't you stick up for yourself?" a male donor asked Romney.

"You have to show your face more on TV," said another.

A third donor counseled Romney on the importance of social media.

A fourth donor urged Romney to "take the gloves off and talk to the people who actually read the paper."

When Romney responded to their reservations by telling the guests about the importance of his three debates against Obama in October, a donor cut him off.

"You will do so well," the donor said. "Your debates are incredible."

(Editing by David Lindsey and Prudence Crowther)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (18)
matthewslyman wrote:
I’m not a Romney supporter (not even American) but Reuters coverage of these SURREPTITIOUS and selectively clipped films has been grossly unfair and biased — basically supporting Obama’s team’s efforts to mischaracterize the things Romney has been saying in these clips. Reuters seems to be competing for the rights to privileged access to Obama’s team…

There’s a better way for any responsible, serious news outlet. The BBC hasn’t given Romney a free pass, but the BBC’s coverage has largely been impartial.

As long as these sneaky film-makers fail to show us the entire film in its proper context, I think we should view these “revelations” as irrelevant to civilized discussion, and should be suspicious of those who attempt to suborn and prejudice democratic due process in this way.

SHOW THE WHOLE FILM IN CONTEXT, OR BE MORE FAIR IN EDITORIAL REMARKS.

“By coincidence, a few hours after the video’s release online, Obama arrived in New York City to tape an interview with Letterman.” — Some coincidence.

Let’s see the real debate please, not this caricatured political theater! I’ll gladly defend Obama in a similar manner, when this happens to him… This sort of thing just isn’t right — American voters deserve better than this (inflammatory headlines and opening paragraphs, inadequately supported by the “evidences” that follow).

Sep 19, 2012 4:18am EDT  --  Report as abuse
MJGSimple wrote:
@matthewslyman – For a non-Romney supporter, non-American you sure do comment on US politics and argue in favor of Romney a lot.

First, as the article states the video has been released in full: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/09/watch-full-secret-video-private-romney-fundraiser

Second, the video is surreptitious, by definition. Romney and his campaign have gone to great lengths to keep these donor meetings a secret.

Third, you have to be joking about Obama appearing on Letterman. Those sorts of things are booked very far in advance. Especially when it comes to the President. You sound like a conspiracy theorist.

Lastly, this article is mostly about how much looser and relatable Romney is in the video DESPITE his remarks about half the country. Maybe you should calm down a bit, really take a moment to think about what YOU’RE trying to get out of the articles. Your opinion is shaping your perception.

Sep 19, 2012 9:45am EDT  --  Report as abuse
matthewslyman wrote:
@MJGSimple:
Reuters headline:
“Behind closed doors, Romney gossips, imitates Kissinger”
From your own observations:
“…this article is mostly about how much looser and relatable Romney is in the video…”
Hence: “inflammatory headlines and opening paragraphs, inadequately supported by the “evidences” that follow”

The article is mostly okay, but whoever is writing Reuters headlines today is trying to make it sound as though the Romney campaign is caught in an irretrievable fiasco and as good as dead (it’s clear they’re actively trying to influence the election, which news-men aren’t supposed to do). My point is, respectable news outlets aren’t supposed to be biased. Some people only have time to read the headlines. It’s not fair to them if the headlines don’t reflect the available evidence, or if the introductory paragraphs of the article cannot be wholly substantiated by the rest of the article. (It’s a cheap tabloid press tactic, to write unsubstantiated, inflammatory and attention-grabbing headlines: I think Reuters is much better than this).

From the “Mother Jones” website you cited:

“Update: According to the source, the recording device was inadvertently turned off between these two segments. The source noticed quickly and began to re-record, resulting in an estimated a one-to-two minute loss of tape.”

Oops. Well I never. Pressed the wrong buttons, and just happened to snip the most inflammatory parts totally out of context…

Romney said in his clarification that in the segment originally aired (one of the releases I was originally referring to), neither the question he was asked, nor parts of his answer, were included (they were apparently edited out). Double oops! Still, at least we have the best parts, which totally show us all the real Romney, right?

Sep 19, 2012 10:05am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.