Three states join lawsuit challenging Dodd-Frank law

Fri Sep 21, 2012 5:14pm EDT

(Reuters) - Three U.S. states have joined a lawsuit that challenges the constitutionality of the 2010 Dodd-Frank law that overhauled U.S. financial oversight and created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

The attorneys general of Michigan, Oklahoma and South Carolina are challenging a portion of Dodd-Frank that empowers the Treasury secretary to order the liquidation of failing financial institutions, according to a complaint filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia on Thursday.

The states joined a suit filed in June by conservative think-tank Competitive Enterprise Institute, a Texas bank and a senior citizens group.

Dodd-Frank, passed by Congress in response to the 2007-2009 U.S. financial crisis, gives regulators broad authority to oversee financial institutions.

It has since drawn criticism from Republicans and industry groups who say the new regulations go too far and could strangle businesses and restrict credit. Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has pledged to repeal Dodd-Frank, but few see that promise turning into a reality.

The states and other groups are now questioning the constitutionality of parts of the controversial law.

"The new regulations do not stabilize our economy, they create greater uncertainty," Alan Wilson, South Carolina's attorney general, said in a statement. "Dodd Frank replaces the rule of law with the rule of politics."

The lawsuit challenges a provision that lets the Treasury secretary call for the liquidation of a financial entity whose failure would threaten U.S. financial stability. The goal was to prevent future bailouts of financial firms.

The states argue in the complaint that the process would have little government oversight and restrict the ability of a company and its creditors to be heard.

The attorneys general from the three states joining the lawsuit are all Republicans.

Wilson told reporters on Friday that state pension funds could struggle to recover assets invested in a firm that is shut down using the Dodd-Frank authority. He said other state attorneys general have expressed interest in joining the lawsuit.

Timothy McTaggart, a partner at law firm Pepper Hamilton who focuses on financial regulatory issues and is not involved in the lawsuit, said questions have been raised about the liquidation rules, such as whether the process allows enough time for firms to participate.

"It certainly raises some interesting issues. Of course, there's a huge presumption that when Congress passes a law, it's constitutional," McTaggart said.

Treasury Department spokeswoman Suzanne Elio said the lawsuit merely revives arguments that have already been made against new Wall Street oversight. She said the department would fight attempts to impede financial regulation.


The initial complaint filed by the Competitive Enterprise Institute and others claimed the CFPB and the Financial Stability Oversight Council, which addresses risks to the overall U.S. financial system, are unconstitutional because they are not subject to sufficient checks by other branches of government.

Congressional Republicans often criticize the consumer agency for operating with what they see as too little oversight.

The CFPB is funded by the Federal Reserve rather than by appropriations from Congress, and critics want it to be led by a bipartisan commission instead of a single director.

"Many of us have been frustrated by the lack of accountability in the CFPB's leadership structure and the lack of transparency in the CFPB's funding structure," Republican Representative Spencer Bachus, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, said during a hearing on Thursday focused on the consumer bureau.

Supporters of the CFPB say it was designed to be independent from Congress to limit the influence of outside political pressure on its rule-making and enforcement.

The lawsuit also challenges President Barack Obama's appointment of Richard Cordray as CFPB director, another point of frustration to Republicans. Dodd-Frank requires the director be confirmed by the Senate, but Obama used a recess appointment to install Cordray at the agency.

The complaint filed Thursday was amended to include the states' challenge against the new liquidation authority. The states did not sign on to the challenges against the consumer protection bureau and the oversight council.

Gregory Jacob, an attorney for the groups that filed the complaint, said the government has until October 26 to respond.

(Reporting By Emily Stephenson and Rachelle Younglai; Editing by Andrea Ricci)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
AlkalineState wrote:
“The states joined a suit filed in June by conservative think tank Competitive Enterprise Institute, a Texas bank and a senior citizens group.”

Bingo. Another right-wing activist group, believing that ‘Wall Street will police itself. Pinky promise this time.’

Dodd-Frank is minimal oversight and regulation. If the right wingers can’t even live with that, they will not win the White House.

Sep 21, 2012 1:21pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
fromthecenter wrote:
I cannot believe that anyone feels that we should let wall street be unregulated after what happened in 2008? This is the republican platform again? Lower taxes on the ‘job creators’, increase defense spending and have another war, and deregulate everything? How can people back this after seeing what happened between 2000-2008?

Sep 21, 2012 5:20pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Alexander_Sr wrote:
If the world economy keeps up it’s pace that it had been doing since the last recession, then the Republicans won’t have to worry about all the regulations. It will be broke along with every other economy on this planet and we will be in a depression and all their money won’t buy them the security that they are accustomed to.

Sep 22, 2012 2:47pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.