Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

Message of humility

A religious fraternity in Rio considers the election of Pope Francis, a confirmation of their beliefs in poverty and simplicity.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

First lawsuits filed against theater in Colorado shooting

Related Topics

DENVER | Fri Sep 21, 2012 6:05pm EDT

DENVER (Reuters) - Three Colorado moviegoers who were hurt when a gunman opened fire in a crowded theater in July sued the owners of the theater, Cinemark USA, on Friday accusing it of failing to provide adequate security, their lawyers said.

The action marks the first known civil lawsuits filed over the July 20 shooting at a suburban Denver screening of the Batman movie "The Dark Knight Rises" that killed 12 people and wounded 58 others.

James Holmes, a former neuroscience graduate student at the University of Colorado, has been charged with murder and attempted murder in the case.

"Readily available security procedures, security equipment and security personnel would likely have prevented or deterred the gunman from accomplishing his planned assault on the theater's patrons," the law firm of Keating, Wagner, Polidori and Free said in a statement.

Representatives of Cinemark could not immediately be reached for comment on the suits.

Prosecutors have depicted Holmes as a young man whose once promising academic career was in tatters as he failed graduate school exams in June and one of his professors suggested he may not have been a good fit for his competitive Ph.D. program.

They have said that Holmes lost his access to the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus after making unspecified threats to a professor on June 12, after which he began a voluntary withdrawal from his program.

They said Holmes began "a detailed and complex plan" to commit murder and obtain an arsenal of guns and protective armor after he was denied access to campus facilities.

On the day of the shooting, Holmes bought a ticket to the midnight screening, then left the theater through an exit door he propped open on his way out, prosecutors said. Holmes then put on a gas mask and ballistic protective gear before returning to the theater and spraying the crowd with gunfire.

Holmes' attorney Daniel King, who analysts said appeared to be laying the groundwork for a possible insanity defense, has said his client suffers from an unspecified mental illness and tried to get help before the shooting.

(Reporting by Keith Coffman; Writing By Cynthia Johnston; Editing by Paul Thomasch and Andrew Hay)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (9)
sjtom wrote:
They could’ve just as easily been shot walking down the street. Who’d they sue then? Horrible tragedy but going after the theater owner is ridiculous.

Sep 21, 2012 5:27pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
ruet wrote:
No surprise. Not likely they’ll prevail. Though the insurance company will probably settle to avoid the multi-million dollar defense expenses.

An unfortunate tragedy but the motivation to file a lawsuit will only benefit the attorneys.

A business owner has absolutely zero requirement to ensure a nutjob will not mow down the patrons of an establishment. Can you imagine the cost of a movie were the theater owner found liable?

Sep 21, 2012 5:45pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
andyS wrote:
Wow, it sucks that the whole tragedy happened, but its pretty scummy of them to sue the theater.

Sep 21, 2012 5:54pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.