First lawsuits filed against theater in Colorado shooting

DENVER Fri Sep 21, 2012 8:48pm EDT

Related Topics

DENVER (Reuters) - Three Colorado moviegoers who were wounded when a gunman opened fire at a July screening of "The Dark Knight Rises" on Friday sued the owner of the theater, Cinemark USA, accusing it of failing to provide adequate security, their lawyers said.

The action marks the first known civil lawsuits filed over the July 20 shootings at a suburban Denver screening of the Batman movie that killed 12 people and wounded 58 others.

James Holmes, a 24-year-old former neuroscience graduate student at the University of Colorado, has been charged with murder and attempted murder in the case.

"Readily available security procedures, security equipment and security personnel would likely have prevented or deterred the gunman from accomplishing his planned assault on the theater's patrons," the law firm of Keating, Wagner, Polidori and Free said in a written statement.

Representatives of Cinemark could not immediately be reached for comment.

On the day of the shooting, prosecutors allege Holmes bought a ticket to the movie, left the theater through an exit door, propping it open on his way out. He then returned to the theater clad in ballistic protective gear and armed with multiple weapons, opening fire on the crowd, prosecutors say.

Public defender Daniel King has said his client suffers from mental illness and sought help before the shootings.

In the lawsuit filed in Denver federal court, victims Joshua Nowlan, Denise Traynom and Brandon Axelrod claim the theater chain was aware of previous criminal activity at or near the cinema including "assaults and robberies" and at least one other shooting involving gang members.

"Although the theater was showing a midnight premiere of the movie and was expecting large crowds of people to attend the midnight showing, no security personnel were present for that showing," the lawsuit said.

Nowlan suffered disabling injuries to his left leg and his right arm, which was nearly severed from the gunshots, the lawsuit said. Traynom was shot in the buttocks and Axelrod was shot in the right knee and ankle.

The lawsuit also states "there was no action taken by theater employees to safely evacuate the many people" in the theater once the shooting spree got underway.

The judge presiding over the criminal case ruled on Friday that some documents in the court file can be publicly released, but arrest and search warrants that detail the specifics of the crime will remain sealed because of the ongoing investigation.

Also on Friday, Aurora Mayor Steve Hogan said that Cinemark sometime next year will reopen the theater, which has been closed since the shooting.

"The theater has been a valued part of our community for many years," Hogan said in a statement. "I am confident Cinemark will continue to remain sensitive to victims, their families, their employees and our community throughout their process of remodeling and reopening."

(Reporting by Keith Coffman; Writing By Cynthia Johnston; Editing by Paul Thomasch and Will Dunham)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
pax_vobiscum wrote:
This country desperately needs tort reform. We won’t get it because trial lawyers legally lobby congress like any other ‘industry’.

Congress has betrayed our country with respect to each and every American special interest. Fire them all.

Sep 21, 2012 9:33pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
gregbrew56 wrote:
The theater’s insurance company will settle for for an amount that will sound like a lot to each victim’s families. (The amount in such cases is subjective.) Their goal is to make the problem go away as cheaply and quickly as possible. The plaintiff lawyer gets his/her 33% with little work, and everybody achieves some level of satisfaction.

Meanwhile, the rest of us pay more for all of our goods and services as a result of these shenanigans.

Tort reform anyone?

Sep 21, 2012 9:51pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
GaryJones wrote:
Here I go being unsympathetic again. – This is serious BS. I do not want everywhere I go to be like the airport. I’m sure a million dollars and getting the TSA procedures at the movies is gonna make it all better for the plaintiffs. This is the lowest form of exploitation. If they win, terrorism wins.

Sep 21, 2012 12:28am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.