Conservatives urge House Speaker to nix wind tax credit

WASHINGTON Mon Sep 24, 2012 4:08pm EDT

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Forty-seven Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives are pushing Speaker John Boehner to eliminate the wind production tax credit, a tax break that has split Republicans and drawn criticism from presidential hopeful Mitt Romney.

Democratic President Barack Obama has urged Congress to extend the credit, which dates to 1992 and has support from Republicans in states that are home to wind farms and manufacturing plants, such as Iowa and South Dakota.

The credit has other powerful proponents in big companies that buy wind energy. Heavyweights including Microsoft Corp, Sprint and Hewlett-Packard have urged renewal. The industry calls it vital to ensuring jobs, including wind turbine tower manufacturing in a broad swath of U.S. states.

Republican opposition to renewable energy tax breaks has been galvanized by anger over a failed solar project backed by the Obama administration. Republicans referred to that project, a start-up company called Solyndra, several times in the letter.

"The Obama administration has poured billions into subsidizing its favored green energy sources," reads the letter dated September 21 from House Republicans to Boehner, also a Republican. "Twenty years of subsidizing wind is more than enough."

Signers of the letter include Republicans on the Energy and Commerce Committee, but does not include members of the powerful tax-writing Ways and Means Committee, which is led by Representative Dave Camp.

A spokesman for Boehner said the issue will be addressed after the election.

Mitt Romney, Obama's Republican rival for the presidency in elections on November 6, irked some members of his party when he backed ending the subsidy earlier this year.

Prominent Senate Republicans including Charles Grassley of Iowa are big wind credit supporters and extension is included in Senate legislation still pending.

The House and Senate are expected to make a decision on the wind credit, along with a slew of breaks known as "tax extenders" and the larger issue of individual tax rates, after the elections and before the extenders expire at year's end.

The wind industry says 37,000 jobs would be lost if the tax credit expires and some big companies have already attributed layoffs to the uncertainty, including Siemens. The credit costs about $11 billion a year. (Reporting by Kim Dixon; Editing by Howard Goller and Todd Eastham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (4)
Whipsplash wrote:
Just another great reason to vote every republican out of every office every chance you get. Vote!

Sep 24, 2012 6:32pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
AlkalineState wrote:
I love it. The GOP arguing with itself again. Aren’t these the same people who routinely claim that letting a tax break expire is a kind of ‘raising taxes.’

So the rebublicans now want to raise taxes? They better hurry and do it while Grover Norquist is in the bathroom. Poppa Grover finds out you turncoat republicans have been sneaking around behind his back rasing taxes, he’s gonna get out his switch and give you fifty lashings. And then send you bird hunting with Dick Cheney.

Sep 24, 2012 7:30pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
fromthecenter wrote:
So, we only provide tax breaks to the real energy creators who need it like OIL? China is spending alot of money on alternative energy, we can’t be left behind on this vital national interest. We must push for alternative resources of energy on every level. We should also spend billions putting in natural gas fueling stations throughout the country. Why don’t we subsidize that as well? We supposedly have enough natural gas resources to run our country for a hundred years? So what are we waiting for?????

Sep 25, 2012 1:18am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.