Weeks before election, Pennsylvania voter ID law back in court

HARRISBURG, Pennsylvania Tue Sep 25, 2012 2:47pm EDT

Related Topics

HARRISBURG, Pennsylvania (Reuters) - A judge who will decide whether Pennsylvania's new voter-identification law should be blocked heard testimony on Tuesday from one witness who said fears that the measure placed an unfair burden on residents were overblown.

The witness, Kurt Myers, a deputy secretary for the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, said about 11,000 voters have gotten the mandated ID cards at the center of the controversial law and thousands more were set to get theirs before the November 6 election.

"We're in the business of issuing IDs, not denying IDs," Myers told Commonwealth Court Judge Robert Simpson.

Simpson, who upheld the law in August, called the hearing on orders by the state's highest court to reconsider his ruling. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court last week told him to decide by October 2 whether voters have "liberal access" to the mandated IDs, and if they don't, to block the law before the November election.

National attention is focused on the court battle over the law passed in March by the Republican-led Legislature without a single Democratic vote, as similar fights over potential voter disenfranchisement by ID laws are waged in Texas and South Carolina.

A flashpoint is the law's effect on voter turnout in Pennsylvania, a key swing state in the tight presidential race just six weeks away.

Critics say it is designed to keep minority voters, who typically vote Democratic, away from the polls. Supporters of the voter ID law say it is aimed at ensuring that only those legally eligible to vote cast ballots.

The law says that all voters must show either a state driver's license, government employee ID or a state non-driver ID card to vote.

Myers said his agency, known as PennDOT, has been doing everything it can to get voter IDs to those who want them. While challengers argue otherwise, Myers maintained there will not be a large, last-minute push by voters to get allowable IDs.

"The data doesn't support that there are thousands and thousands of people out there without (a) voter ID," he said.

Simpson, who has until October 2 to issue his ruling, was expected to continue hearing testimony on Thursday and indicated he will rule shortly after that.

"I am not of the mind to wait until the last minute. The sooner the better," Simpson said. (Writing by Barbara Goldberg; editing by Philip Barbara)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
LesMoor wrote:
Poor, poor TEApublicans. Their best boy keeps stepping on his *ick every time he opens his mouth, the courts are not in favor of the their wasting of tax payer money to exclude votes (TEApublicans continue to press for voter ID laws despite proof no serious voter fraud problem exists), and only 42 days until the election. What are they to do?

Sep 25, 2012 10:51am EDT  --  Report as abuse
AlkalineState wrote:
Speaking of adding hurdles to Constitutional rights, what would the NRA say if there were states starting to require “state-issued ID cards” at gun shows in order for people to exercise their Second Amendment rights. You know, just to make sure we’re not letting a bunch of non-citizens sneak in and do ‘citizen’ things.

Luckily, we don’t have to guess. Turns out, the NRA (and the GOP platform) are opposed to such hurdles. So why are they fighting FOR voting hurdles:


Sep 25, 2012 11:44am EDT  --  Report as abuse
PPhermit wrote:
Republicans has change the voters rights to voters privelege . They are rewriting the constitution. They keep yelling that the democrats are taking your rights away __I don’t know what rights that the democrats has taken away .They aren’t trying to take gun rights away but guns need regulated. Kids toys are regulated so why shouldn’t dangerous adult toys be regulated . But the republicans keeps trying to take voters rights, woman rights etc .

Sep 25, 2012 1:24pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.