Lawmakers press for broader restraints on China solar imports

WASHINGTON Wed Sep 26, 2012 6:36pm EDT

Employees carry solar panels at a solar power plant in Aksu, Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region May 18, 2012. REUTERS/Stringer

Employees carry solar panels at a solar power plant in Aksu, Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region May 18, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Stringer

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Eight lawmakers urged President Barack Obama's administration on Wednesday to broaden the scope of proposed duties on billions of dollars of solar panels from China, as the U.S. government nears its final rulings in the case.

The lawmakers, led by Oregon Democratic Senators Ron Wyden and Jeff Merkley, criticized an earlier Commerce Department decision to exclude Chinese solar panels containing cells made in another country from preliminary duties of more than 30 percent.

They argued that would allow Chinese solar panel producers to escape U.S. duties by outsourcing cell production to another country, even if the materials for the cells come from China and the final solar panels are assembled there.

"This would appear to undermine the intent of the petition that was filed by the U.S. industry, and invite the circumvention of the anti-dumping and countervailing duty orders," the lawmakers said.

SolarWorld America, an Oregon-based subsidiary of Germany's SolarWorld AG, has led the drive for the United States to impose duties on Chinese-made solar products, which it says are unfairly priced and subsidized.

SolarWorld is also behind a push in Europe for duties on Chinese solar products.

The U.S. Commerce Department is scheduled to release its final determinations in the case on October 10. A department official said on Wednesday the agency would re-examine the question of how widely to apply any duties.

A separate agency, the U.S. International Trade Commission, has the final word on whether duties are applied. The date for that vote has not been announced, but typically occurs shortly after the final Commerce Department determination.

The trade panel will hold a hearing on the solar case on October 3. It must decide whether U.S. producers have been materially injured, or are threatened with material injury, by the lower-priced Chinese product for the final duties to go into force.

Companies have been required to post bonds or cash deposits based on the earlier preliminary duty rates. Those will be refunded if no injury is found.

(Additional reporting by Roberta Rampton; Editing by Peter Cooney)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
totherepublic wrote:
Didn’t Obama just spend something like 150 million on Chinese solar panels…yes he did. What the h—.

“Last week, the Washington Times published an eye-opening report about a previously unnoticed memo from the Inspector General of the General Services Administration, who in July 2011 raised some questions about the solar panels that had been installed atop the Senator Paul Simon Federal Building in Carbondale, Illinois.

These solar panels were part of a renovation partially funded by President Obama’s 2009 “stimulus” bill, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. But they came from… China”

Sep 26, 2012 7:55pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
mgunn wrote:
Nevermind the biggest subsidy in the history of mankind…. TARP

Sep 26, 2012 10:42pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.