Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Accused Colorado gunman made threats to psychiatrist

James Holmes is seen in this undated police handout photo. Holmes, a former neuroscience graduate student, is accused of opening fire on July 20 at a midnight screening of the Batman movie ''The Dark Knight Rises'' in Aurora, a Denver suburb. REUTERS/Arapahoe County Sheriff's Office/Handout

James Holmes is seen in this undated police handout photo. Holmes, a former neuroscience graduate student, is accused of opening fire on July 20 at a midnight screening of the Batman movie ''The Dark Knight Rises'' in Aurora, a Denver suburb.

Credit: Reuters/Arapahoe County Sheriff's Office/Handout

Related Topics

DENVER | Fri Sep 28, 2012 1:56pm EDT

DENVER (Reuters) - Accused Colorado gunman James Holmes made threats to a university psychiatrist before a July shooting rampage at a suburban Denver screening of a Batman movie that killed 12 people, according to court documents released on Friday.

The University of Colorado psychiatrist reported those unspecified threats to campus police before the shooting at a midnight screening of "The Dark Knight Rises," a court document filed a week after the shooting and unsealed on Friday showed.

Holmes, a former neuroscience graduate student, has been charged with murder and attempted murder over the rampage, one of the worst outbursts of U.S. gun violence in recent years. In addition to those who died, 58 people were wounded.

University psychiatrist Lynne Fenton, who has testified that she treated Holmes, 24, more than a month before the July 20 shooting, has said her professional relationship with Holmes ended in mid-June.

"The relationship was terminated after the defendant made threats towards who reported the matter to the University of Colorado (CU) police department," the newly unsealed documents said.

"As a result of these actions, university administration terminated the defendant's access privileges to all or part of the Anschutz campus," the documents said.

The documents said the threats were made to a university psychiatrist, but they were heavily redacted, and Fenton's name does not appear in the document.

Prosecutors have depicted Holmes as a young man whose once promising academic career was in tatters as he failed graduate school oral board exams in June and one of his professors suggested he may not have been a good fit for his competitive Ph.D. program.

They have said that Holmes lost his access to the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus after making unspecified threats to a professor on June 12, after which he began a voluntary withdrawal from his program.

ARSENAL OF GUNS

Other court documents among the 57 unsealed on Friday give more insight into a notebook that Holmes mailed to Fenton the day before the massacre.

Prosecutors expressed frustration with a published report saying the notebook was "full of details about how he was going to kill people," and included "drawings and illustrations of the massacre," according to one document.

That information, given to Fox News from an unidentified law enforcement source, violated Holmes' doctor-patient privilege, prosecutors argued in the July 25 document.

Prosecutors said Holmes began "a detailed and complex plan" to commit murder and obtain an arsenal of guns and protective armor after he was denied access to campus facilities.

Holmes' attorney Daniel King, who analysts have said appears to be laying the groundwork for a possible insanity defense, has said his client suffers from an unspecified mental illness and had tried to get help before the shooting.

Previous media reports have said Fenton reported her concerns about Holmes to a campus threat assessment team and a campus police officer.

(Writing and additional reporting by Mary Slosson; Editing by Paul Thomasch and Vicki Allen)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
bondcliff wrote:
I would, like to hold responsible any party to a crime, especially a brutal crime such as the theater shooting. However, I would not expect the theater to in anyone’s wildest dreams to anticipate a lone crazed gunman at a midnight showing of Batman. I go to shows, to movies, to ballgames, to the mall, to work.I don’t expect nor desire to be treated as I am when going to the airport. I don’t expect, nor desire, armed guards, body searches or intimidation by authorities. The perpetrator of this crime is the crazed gunmen. It is a rare ,albeit extreme incident that should not force us to live in a police state.

Sep 27, 2012 9:25pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
elchungadero wrote:
Yes the perpetrator was a crazed gunman. However, given the theater’s posted “no guns” policy, there is a reasonable argument to be made that company policy made this event worse and thus opens them to liability for what occurred. Mass shootings are not the rarities they once were, whether here in America or abroad; companies should recognize this fact and change their policies accordingly. All the Cinemark did was disarm the gunman’s potential victims, giving him a place where he knew there would be little to no chance for them to fight back. What’s the big deal, right bondcliff?

Sep 27, 2012 10:52pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Prairiefire wrote:
Can you say “Ambulance Chasers…”

Sep 27, 2012 11:50pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.