Output not stockpiles key to cap food cost-EU aid chief

MILAN Mon Oct 1, 2012 9:49am EDT

EU Commissioner for Development Andris Piebalgs speaks to Reuters during an interview at Chatrium hotel in Yangon February 13, 2012. REUTERS/Soe Zeya Tun

EU Commissioner for Development Andris Piebalgs speaks to Reuters during an interview at Chatrium hotel in Yangon February 13, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Soe Zeya Tun

MILAN (Reuters) - Building strategic agricultural stocks to curb market volatility, as proposed by France, would not be the most effective way to tame food prices, EU Development Commissioner Andris Piebalgs said on Monday.

He said what was needed instead was an increase in food production in the world's poorest countries, which remain vulnerable to the threat of a new food crisis despite the recent easing in grain prices from record highs hit this summer.

Last month, French President Francois Hollande launched a global campaign to win support for creating strategic stockpiles of food commodities after a year of drought renewed fears of a new crisis in agricultural supplies.

Paris has also called an emergency meeting of G20 farm ministers for mid-October to discuss ways to curb price volatility.

"I believe it is one of the instruments but it is not the most effective," Piebalgs told Reuters in an interview on the sidelines of an international cooperation conference in Milan when asked about the French stockpiles proposal.

"The answer to food insecurity is sufficient food production in the world's poorest regions," he said, adding that increasing investments in agriculture was the best way to keep a lid on prices.

"Resilience in farming, access to water, fighting against climate change, crops, access to the markets - it's a lot of elements, one element does not help sufficiently," he said.

The worst drought in more than 50 years in the United States has sent corn and soybean prices to record highs over the summer and, coupled with drought in Russia and other Black Sea exporting countries, raised fears of a global food crisis like the one that led to rioting in poor countries in 2008.

Food prices have fallen back in the past few weeks but Piebalgs said there was no room for complacency.

"Globally, food prices are now not a matter of concern in the short term but there are problems in the Sahel, continuing problems in the Horn of Africa and other regions," he said, also mentioning Haiti. "The situation remains very vulnerable."

France first raised the issue of reserves last year as it chaired the Group of 20 leading economies. But the final deal limited promises to food aid stocks in countries that might most need them, a measure that is yet to be implemented.

It is unclear whether Hollande will be more successful this time round in convincing the United States or his European peers to rebuild public grain stockpiles that were liquidated decades ago. Or, as in the case of China, to use existing government stockpiles more collaboratively to address global issues.

The French proposal, which was backed by the U.N.'s Food and Agriculture Organisation, did not specify how and where the food stockpiles would be developed.

Analysts have been skeptical about the idea of reserves on a global scale because they are costly to run, particularly as grain has a shorter storage life than commodities like oil.

Piebalgs said he hoped European moves to cap the use of food-based biofuels would be followed elsewhere, and said there was a growing consensus, even in the United States, which is a major biofuels producer, that food crops should first and foremost feed people.

"We believe that biofuels should be produced from food residues after crops have been used for providing foodstuff, then the remains can be transformed for second- and third-generation biofuels," he said.

The EU Commission announced a major shift in biofuel policy last month, saying it plans to limit crop-based biofuels to 5 percent of transport fuel.

(additional reporting by Sara Rossi and Paris bureau; Editing by Anthony Barker)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
AphotoWizard wrote:
With great deference to French President Francois Hollande, I believe he and many other concerned leaders are looking at this problem from the wrong end. We do not need great stores of wheat and other food, nor do we need greater food production.

What this world needs is a way to limit the number of tricycle motors we create each year.

The over production of people in all countries is the real problem. And with the exception of China, no one is ready even discuss the issue much less take action. The population of the world is now doubling at an ever increasing rate. It currently takes about 75 years to create an entirely new world full of people the same size as the one we currently have. How many more worlds full of people can we feed, clothe, and house?

While I am not the prophet of doom, there are consequences of our continued inaction. In some parts of the world the water is polluted, the food is scarce, and housing is abominable. Unfortunately this is natures way of solving the problem, it makes people like you and me sick and eventually die early. This makes way for new people to share in the pain and suffering.

In my view we have the choice to convince, cajole, bribe, or force people to have fewer babies or continue to face famine, sickness, wars and other pains as the number of people continue to grow past the local ability of their land to support them. Please note that wars only postpone the problem. They kill off a few people and acquire land that can feed the victors rather than the losers, but the race to the bottom continues.

These are just my thought President Hollande yours are clearly different. I just hope that you are right or you and other leaders come over to my way of thinking before it is too late.

Oct 01, 2012 12:51pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.