Fed's Bullard warns inflation won't ease U.S. debt burden

MEMPHIS Thu Oct 4, 2012 11:35pm EDT

President and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis James Bullard gestures during an interview at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis June 8, 2011. REUTERS/Peter Newcomb

President and CEO of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis James Bullard gestures during an interview at the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis June 8, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Peter Newcomb

MEMPHIS (Reuters) - The United States faces a debt problem, but any suggestion that the burden can be eased by allowing inflation to rise will just result in higher borrowing costs in the future, a senior Federal Reserve official said on Thursday.

James Bullard, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, said that inflation was sometimes seen as a way to "partially default" on existing debts, because it lowers the amount the borrower repays in real, inflation-adjusted terms.

"A partial default today through higher inflation would be paid for via higher inflation premiums in future borrowing. Creditors would want to protect themselves against an unpredictable central bank," he told the Economic Club of Memphis.

"Alas, in economics there is no free lunch," he said, quoting Nobel Prize-winning economist Milton Friedman.

Bullard is not a voting member of the Fed's policy-setting committee this year, but will hold a rotating vote in 2013.

"Is this happening? Distant inflation expectations from the TIPS (Treasury inflation protected securities) market seem to suggest that investors do not completely trust the Fed to deliver on its 2 percent inflation target," he said.

The U.S. has been slowly recovering from the deep 2007-2009 recession, which was caused by a collapse of the housing market that triggered a devastating global financial crisis.

Many U.S. households were left owing more on their homes than the properties were worth. At the same time, the U.S. government has aggressively expanded spending to shield the country from an even deeper downturn, widening the deficit and driving up national debt.

Bullard has publicly stated that he would not have voted for the Fed's third round of so-called quantitative easing announced at its policy meeting last month, at which it also committed to holding interest rates near zero until at least mid-2015.

The Fed also promised that it would keep rates ultra-low even as the economy strengthened, in order to ensure that stubbornly high U.S. unemployment was brought back to more normal levels, so long as inflation remained under control.

The national unemployment rate was 8.1 percent in August. The Labor Department will release the September employment report on Friday.

Bullard said that any effort to inflate away the debt problem would impose severe costs on the people who had lent the money, or on those who lived on fixed incomes.


"The partial default would occur against savers, mostly older U.S. households, and against foreign creditors," he said.

Fed critics say that its $2.3 trillion purchases of Treasuries and mortgage-backed bonds, plus September's decision to buy another $40 billion of mortgage-backed securities every month until hiring picks up, will severely sap the value of the U.S. dollar.

Fed activism has also been caught up in the U.S. presidential election, turning the central bank into a lightning rod for critics of big government who complain 'Washington' is intruding too far into the private sector's space.

Bullard, whose Federal Reserve district embraces states in heartland America far from both coasts, acknowledged public concern about "what the heck is going to happen next" that could harm confidence in the central bank.

"I would very much like to get out of the kind of crisis mode that we've been in. You know, after four years it is not a crisis any more. (We've) had plenty of chance to adjust at that point," Bullard told the audience during a question-and-answer session.

Minutes of the FOMC's September meeting released earlier on Thursday also showed that many committee members favor a commitment to lower the jobless rate beneath a certain level before raising interest rates, in order to better communicate its determination to bolster U.S. growth.

However, making clear this vision was not without opposition, Bullard said he had problems with that approach.

"I think we should be very cautious about tying monetary policy explicitly to the unemployment rate," he told reporters on the sidelines of the dinner event, warning that the Fed could find itself in a policy "box" with such an approach.

(Reporting by Alister Bull; Editing by Paul Simao)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
wesatch wrote:
….”but any suggestion that the burden can be eased by allowing inflation to rise will just result in higher borrowing costs in the future”…..

A big DUH! to Mr. Bullard and the rest of the Fed. By manipulating interest rates to now negative levels by rolling the dice on a quick recovery they have now created the financial monster of all monsters.

Oct 05, 2012 9:54am EDT  --  Report as abuse
drpalms wrote:
There is only 5 cents left of the dollar earned in 1957 and another 2% is the cliff. Printing more federal reserve notes that state dollars remain notes not money, legally counterfeited as “fiat”. central banks around the world are buying gold with the federal reserve notes. Printing notes that have not been created by labor and services do not create jobs. Real money created by work and services increase the ability to consume and increase employment by virtue of increasing demand. Legal counterfeiting doe not create demand. What the FED intends is suicidal.

The actual inflation caused by the fed has been from $34.95 in 1957 for an ounce of gold, to today’s price October 9, 2012 $1,763.00 destroying in the process the life savings of American who paid into social security all their working lives

Oct 09, 2012 2:09pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.