U.S. deficit ends fourth fiscal year above $1 trillion: CBO

WASHINGTON Fri Oct 5, 2012 8:14pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The federal budget deficit for the just-ended 2012 fiscal year shrank by $207 billion from the prior year, but still marked its fourth straight year above $1 trillion, Congress' budget referee estimated on Friday.

The deficit equaled about 7 percent of U.S. economic output, down from 8.7 percent in 2011, 9 percent in 2010 and 10.1 percent in 2009, but it was still greater than in any other year since 1947, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office said.

Economists generally consider any deficit that exceeds 3 percent of U.S. gross domestic product to be unsustainable in the long term.

CBO said a $75 billion surplus September surplus helped to hold the full-year fiscal 2012 deficit to $1.09 trillion, compared with a $1.297 trillion deficit in fiscal 2012.

The September surplus was just the second month in the black for the U.S. government since September 2008, when the country was in the throes of a financial crisis. The September data was buoyed by strong quarterly corporate income tax payments and $7 billion from the sale of shares in bailed-out insurer American International Group.

The U.S. Treasury is expected to release official final figures for the year ended September 30 next week.

Republicans, including presidential nominee Mitt Romney, have long been hammering President Barack Obama for overseeing four straight years of trillion-dollar deficits during his time in office. Democrats have countered that these were necessary to avoid another depression and help dig out of a deep recession they inherited.

Whether the U.S. deficit will mark a fifth year above $1 trillion in fiscal 2013 depends on how Congress handles the year-end "fiscal cliff" of expiring tax cuts and automatic spending cuts.

If that massive fiscal tightening happens as scheduled, the deficit could be as low as $641 billion next year, according to a CBO estimate in August. But if Congress keeps current tax rates in place and finds a way to avoid the spending cuts, CBO estimates the deficit at about where it is now -- $1.04 trillion.

In September's rare surplus, the CBO estimated that receipts grew $23 billion compared with a year earlier, while outlays shrank by $115 billion.

Most of the spending decline was the result of calendar shifts associated with benefit payments, but adjusting for this, there were some notable changes.

Net payments to government-controlled housing finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac fell by $7 billion in September because they did not need any capital injections. Outlays for unemployment benefits fell by $6 billion while military spending fell by $5 billion.

For the full fiscal year, total receipts grew 6.4 percent to $2.45 trillion, while outlays fell 1.6 percent to $3.54 trillion, CBO estimated.

Individual income tax receipts rose 3.4 percent while corporate income tax collections rose 33.7 percent. Most categories of spending fell, except for Social Security benefits, which rose 5.9 percent, to $762 billion, and Medicare, which rose 3.2 percent to $469 billion after adjusting for offsetting receipts.

(Editing by Leslie Gevirtz)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
americanguy wrote:
Tax cuts for the wealthy so far, cost over 2 trillion dollars.
Two wars, cost over 2 trillion dollars.
Both can be easily corrected with a few adjustments.
I see no issue.
Of course Romney wants more tax cuts for the wealthy and more wars, but somehow some people think that will NOT make things even worse.

Oct 05, 2012 9:22pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
tiktin wrote:
I’m a little dubious about these numbers. The deficit must continue to rise because congress never cuts anything, and the cost of entitlements will continue to rise because the health care industry, the education industry, and whatever else the government is paying for, will charge whatever the government is willing to pay, and the government is willing to pay whatever they charge. In addition, the conventional wisdom on Capitol Hill continues to be that the way to political success is to buy votes with other people’s money, borrowed money and, increasingly, printed money. The members of congress don’t really care where the money is coming from. They figure all they have to do is appropriate it and the treasury will find it somehow. The budget is shot through with thousands of narrow special interest appropriations each of which benefits only a small special interest group. There are more than 2,800 grant, subsidy, loan and loan guarantee programs, and that number is increasing all the time. Inevitably, the fed will have to print more and more money to pay for all these programs so that ultimately, the money will become worthless and the whole system will collapse.

Oct 05, 2012 11:30pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
minipaws wrote:
Not suprising, since they are building an $800,000,000 Eastern Bypass around Peoria, IL, even though tri-county population has decreased since 1980. Why, because somebody, wants a bridge named after them.

Oct 07, 2012 6:50am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.