Slide halted, Romney challenging Obama in swing states

Sun Oct 7, 2012 5:29pm EDT

Related Topics

* Romney claws his way back after first debate

* Only 2 points behind in Reuters/Ipsos poll

By Steve Holland

PORT ST. LUCIE, Fla., Oct 7 (Reuters) - Mitt Romney appeared on Sunday to have halted his perilous slide in the polls and is back to running a close race with President Barack Obama as he prepares a new assault on the Democrat over foreign policy.

A solid performance against Obama at Wednesday's first presidential debate in Denver has helped the Republican challenger regain ground in several swing states after three weeks of campaign stumbles that had appeared to jeopardize his chances of winning the Nov. 6 election.

Romney is now sounding more confident and has put the normally sure-footed Obama campaign on the defensive with a vice presidential debate coming up on Friday between the gaffe-prone Democrat Joe Biden and Republican Paul Ryan.

Romney is to deliver a foreign policy address in Virginia on Monday to try to put more pressure on Obama after the deaths of four Americans in Libya last month, including ambassador Christopher Stevens.

At a rally in Port St. Lucie, Florida, Romney took a jab at Obama about his timid debate performance.

"You all had the chance to hear his answers or his non-answers. Now of course days later we are hearing his excuses and next January we're going to see him leave the White House for the last time," Romney said.

A rash of polls, both nationally and in specific states, showed evidence of Romney's improvement headed into the final month of campaigning.

Romney solidified his post-debate "bounce" in the latest Reuters/Ipsos daily poll, coming in 2 points behind Obama for the third day in a row. The former Massachusetts governor has clawed back from a 6-point deficit last week as Sunday's poll showed Obama at 47 percent and Romney 45 percent.

"Romney's performance in the debate I think has improved his share of the vote for now ... It's a significant change from where we were a couple of weeks ago," said Ipsos pollster Julia Clark.


An average of polls by in several swing states also showed a tightening in the race in some of the places where the election will be decided. Romney was about even with Obama in Florida and Virginia and 3 points behind him in Ohio.

A poll by Public Policy Polling, a Democratic organization, had Obama up by only 2 points in traditionally Democratic Wisconsin. Previous polls had shown a comfortable lead for the president.

Not taken into account yet was the possible impact of the improvement in the U.S. jobless rate announced on Friday. It fell to 7.8 percent in September, the lowest in almost four years, and gave Obama a talking point to defend his stewardship of the economy.

Obama flew to California on a fund-raising swing on Sunday to try to keep up a recent strong campaign finance performance. He raised $181 million together with the Democrats in September, a record for either man's campaign this year.

Ally Robert Gibbs acknowledged that Obama's debate showing was less than electrifying.

"I think the president understood that he hadn't performed up to his own expectations pretty quickly ... after he got off the stage that night," Gibbs told ABC's "This Week."

Campaign officials said Obama would try to challenge Romney more on what they felt were distortions by the Republican challenger. They have been complaining in particular about Romney's vow to cut income taxes across the board for all Americans by 20 percent.

The Obama campaign says it would cost $5 trillion from the federal budget to pay for the tax cuts. The Romney campaign says it would be "revenue neutral" because the resulting growth in the U.S. economy would generate more tax revenue and because Romney would end many tax deductions for wealthier Americans.

"He cannot name one loophole that he would close. If you took away all the loopholes for upper income Americans, every single one of them could still be trillions of dollars short," Obama campaign adviser David Axelrod said on CBS' "Face the Nation."

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
ruet wrote:
When we evaluate an individual, do we not look at consistency?

Sure, it’s great if your “D” student gets some tutoring, focuses, studies really, really hard for the next exam and gets an “A”.

Does that one event then make the student an “A” student? No, it does not.

Now if several months pass and the same student applies the same hard work and continues to get an “A” in every quiz and exam, there is an appearance that the student has turned around their academic performance.

The same theory can be used with a job applicant. In this case, the office of the Presidency.

It has been well over 5 years now that Mitt Romney has been “applying” for the position of US President. How in the world can anyone “switch” their impression of him based upon one single event? An event just over 30 days from an election? An event in which must of Romney contradicted what he had said only days/weeks/months previously? An event in which most of what he did say was blatant lies and fabrications?

What happened to the “anyone but Romney” crowd? Are they so desperate that they are willing to cling to any sign that their candidate has now changed his ways (which he hasn’t: his ‘performance’ was loaded with lies and he still is as vague as ever) that they are now willing to rally around his candidacy?

I’ll stick with the candidate that has been consistent and has been at the helm while our economy has turned around in spite of the obstacles confronting him.

Oct 07, 2012 5:48pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
tluan48 wrote:
A sad comment on a gullible electorate if they are impressed with a performance laced with prevarication and flip flopping. Perhaps that’s the reason Governor Romney has a 35% unfavorability rating in Massachusetts.

Oct 07, 2012 6:08pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Hey! Where are all the conservatives swearing by their God that all the polls are rigged and virtually the entire news media is a liberal-biased conspiracy?

We still have two more debates, plus the veep debate this Friday. And just because Obama didn’t bring up Romney’s inane and incorrect “47%” remarks, doesn’t mean the electorate is forgetting those comments where Romney insulted half the country.

On that note, I think Obama’s strategy is easily discernable. Had he brought it up at the debate, Romney would then have had a chance to explain the comments away in front of 67 Million voters.

It’s much better to let the “47%” comments simmer in the public consciousness, as indeed they are. In this Age of the Internet, where millions of voters are posting, reading and communicating, it’s highly unlikely the vast majority of the electorate is going to forget what Romney really thinks about almost half of the country.

And while its impact is a bit dubious, I do look forward to the upcoming debate between Biden/Ryan. I hope Biden confronts Ryan on Ryan’s many lies, since he can’t confront Romney directly on Romney’s lies.

The veep debate will be the Old Lion versus the Young Pit Viper.

Oct 07, 2012 6:28pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.