A handout photograph distributed by Syria's national news agency SANA on May 22,2013, show detained men, blindfolded and handcuffed, described by SANA as "terrorists fighters", a term commonly used to describe rebels fighting to topple President Bashar al-Assad, in Qusair, near Homs.    SANA/Handout via Reuters

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

SpaceX rocket glitch puts satellite in wrong orbit

Related Topics

1 of 8. The SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket launches from Space Launch Complex 40 at the Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Cape Canaveral, Florida in this October 7, 2012, file photo. A prototype communications satellite flying as a secondary payload aboard a Space Exploration Technologies Falcon 9 rocket was sent into the wrong orbit because of a problem during launch Sunday evening, officials said October 9, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Michael Brown/Files

Tue Oct 9, 2012 5:54pm EDT

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla., Oct 9 - A prototype communications satellite flying as a secondary payload aboard a Space Exploration Technologies Falcon 9 rocket was sent into the wrong orbit because of a problem during launch Sunday evening, officials said Tuesday.

One of the nine Merlin engines powering the Falcon 9 rocket shut down early, though the other engines burned longer to make up for the loss of thrust, saving the primary mission of delivering a Dragon cargo capsule to the International Space Station for NASA.

The rocket blasted off at 8:35 p.m. EDT Sunday (0035 GMT Monday) from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida, restoring a U.S. supply line to the $100 billion orbital outpost, a project of 15 nations, following the end of the shuttle program last year.

The Dragon freighter is due to arrive at the space station, which flies about 250 miles above Earth, on Wednesday.

Space Exploration Technologies said its rocket, which was created by Internet entrepreneur Elon Musk and his team at SpaceX, as the company is known, could lose two engines and still make its intended orbit.

"Like the Saturn 5 (moon rocket) and modern airliners, Falcon 9 is designed to handle an engine-out situation and still complete its mission. No other rocket currently flying has this ability," privately owned SpaceX said in a statement.

But that flexibility didn't help satellite communications provider Orbcomm, which owned a prototype OG2 communications satellite flying aboard the Falcon 9.

The satellite was deposited in a lower-than-intended orbit, Orbcomm said in a statement.

The company declined to release details, but Jonathan's Space Report, a website that tracks space launches, says Orbcomm expected its satellite to be placed into an elliptical orbit with a low point of 217 miles and a high point of 466 miles from Earth. That would later become a circular orbit at 466 miles from Earth.

Instead, it ended up in an orbit that ranges from 126 miles to 200 miles.

Orbcomm said an analysis has begun to determine if the satellite can use its onboard propulsion system to boost its orbit.

"Orbcomm will not be able to get to its operational 750 x 750 kilometer orbit, but there's a chance they'll get a few month's of system tests out of it," concludes Jonathan McDowell, a Harvard University astrophysicist who publishes the Space Report.

The company still plans to launch 17 more OG2 satellites on two Falcon 9 rockets in 2013 and 2014.

Those spacecraft will be primary payloads and delivered directly into their operational orbits, Orbcomm said.

SpaceX declined to release financial details of its contract with Orbcomm, and Orbcomm did not respond to requests for comment.

(Editing by Jane Sutton and Philip Barbara)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (11)
mlorrey wrote:
Secondary payloads are not guaranteed to reach orbit, they are always at the mercy of the needs of the primary payload, no matter what rocket you use. The fact is that, unlike any other rocket flying today, Falcon 9 was able to make orbit with 1 failed engine, when ANY other launcher in the world this would have been a launch failure and a 100% financial loss for all payload owners. Orbcomm flew this satellite as a secondary payload because its a prototype, not a production, money making, piece of equipment.

Oct 09, 2012 8:20pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
LETMEBECLEAR wrote:
Well It’s not rocket science… Oh wait it is!

Oct 09, 2012 8:23pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
And the expert survey on their success of getting it into an operational orbit and still have enough station keeping fuel to keep it in its operational orbit through its designed lifespan?

BUSSSSSSSSSSSSS.

No my frends, it’s not gonna happen. I say this from personal experience of trying to do the very same thing with two very expensive military communications satellites with very moderate success. One was totally useless by the time we got it into orbit and the other as a very shortened life span as a result of getting it into orbit. That one wouldn’t have even made to it’s operational orbit save for the existence of Ion propulsion station keeping thrusters that did the job but sacrificed a lot of station keeping fuel in the process.

I hope this recent communications satellite was correctly insured because I am betting they are going to need it even though I do hope their efforts are successful.

They will be lucky if they can achieve a 200 mile circular orbit especially since there is a lot of space junk in that area of space to contend with. Hopefully they can at least do a complete systems checkout before they burn it into the Earth’s atmosphere to get rid of it.

No I don’t like to see these things happen but that’s the reality of the space business. I wonder what the loss is going to cost them? Hopefully not the billion or so dollars the two vehicles I worked with were valued as. I am guessing not as this satellite’s operational orbit is LEO, low earth orbit as compared to geosynchronous orbits that are roughly 22,000 miles out to what is known as the Clark Belt named after Science Fiction writer Arthur C Clark who first conceived of geosynchronous orbits. Science fiction becoming science fact.

Oct 09, 2012 8:57pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.