German cabinet approves bill allowing circumcision of boys

BERLIN Wed Oct 10, 2012 8:51am EDT

Related Topics

BERLIN (Reuters) - Germany's cabinet approved a draft law on Wednesday protecting the right to circumcise infant boys, which it says will end months of legal uncertainty after a local court banned the practice, causing outrage among Muslims and Jews.

The June ruling by a Cologne district court that circumcision constitutes "bodily harm" sparked an emotional national debate about religious freedom and the procedure itself.

An embarrassed German government pledged to bring in new legislation by the autumn to safeguard the right of parents to have their sons circumcised.

"It was always our intention to lift this ruling," German government spokesman Steffen Seibert told a news conference.

Parliament must still approve the bill for it to become law.

The speed with which national lawmakers agreed to draw up a new law underscored sensitivity to charges of intolerance in a country haunted by its Nazi past.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel said the country risked becoming a laughing stock if Jews were not allowed to practice their rituals.

The bill states that the operation should take place with the most effective pain relief possible and only if parents have been fully informed about the nature of the procedure. It makes no mention of religious motivations for circumcision.

The court ban had applied only to the Cologne region but doctors across the country refused to carry out operations because of what they saw as a risk of legal action.

"It was very important that our government reacted so quickly and responsibly. The proposal is balanced and suitable for lifting the legal uncertainty," said Charlotte Knobloch, a German Jewish leader.

She expressed her relief that "Germany would not become the one country in the world where Jewish people cannot practice their religion" and added she hoped the damaging public debate about circumcision would end.

About 120,000 Jews are registered as living in Germany along with around 4 million Muslims, many of them from Turkey.

The Cologne court, ruling in the case of a Muslim boy who suffered bleeding after circumcision, said the practice inflicted bodily harm and should not be carried out on young boys, although it could be performed on older males with their consent.

Anticipating the government bill, Berlin city authorities announced last month that parents were free to have their sons circumcised without fear of prosecution and the operations resumed in the German capital.

(Reporting by Alexandra Hudson, editing by Gareth Jones and Anthony Barker)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
ml66uk wrote:
They passed a bill to protect cutting parts off children’s genitals!?! Shameful. It’s illegal to cut off a girl’s prepuce, or to make any incision on a girl’s genitals, even if no tissue is removed, and even though some people regard it as their religious right or duty to cut their daughters. Even a pinprick is banned. Why don’t boys get the same protection?

Everyone should be able to decide for themselves whether or not they want parts of their genitals cut off. It’s *their* body.

Oct 10, 2012 9:55am EDT  --  Report as abuse
unreason wrote:
ml66uk,
female genital mutilation (even type Ia and IV as you mention) is not required by any religion (but some Sunnis believe that a hadith commanding a practitioner to “not cut severely” supports the practice): FGM has never been part of Christianity; in Judaism, it has only ever been practiced non-religiously in Ethiopia (but is halachically forbidden according to some sources); is not required in Islam and it is controversial whether Islam even allows it. According to Amnesty International, only a small number of Muslims and animists perform FGM. Circumcision, on the other hand, is a religious requirement of Judaism and Islam and is supported and even required by some Christian churches (e.g., Nomiya).

In deciding whether a parent should be legally allowed to have an unnecessary medical procedure performed on their child, there are a number of considerations, one of which must be religious rite if you claim to allow freedom of religion. The only question is whether there is direct, immediate or lasting harm that could override any such religious basis, and clearly the judge believed there was, but most everyone else mentioned disagreed.

Call the act shameful if you will, but calling a bill permitting it so long as it complies with modern medical practice shameful really does not support your position.

Oct 10, 2012 4:13pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures