U.S. court clears Samsung phone, hands Apple setback

WASHINGTON/SAN FRANCISCO Thu Oct 11, 2012 4:44pm EDT

1 of 8. Apple's iPhone (L) and Samsung Galaxy Note are displayed at a shop in Tokyo in this August 31, 2012, file photo. Samsung filed a motion against Apple saying the iPhone 5 had infringed on some of the company's patents, October 2, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Kim Kyung-Hoon/Files

Related Video

Related Topics

WASHINGTON/SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court overturned a pretrial sales ban against Samsung Electronics Co Ltd's Galaxy Nexus smartphone, dealing a setback to Apple Inc in its battle against Google Inc's increasingly popular mobile software.

Apple is waging war on several fronts against Google, whose Android software powers many of Samsung's devices.

The ruling on Thursday from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit is not expected to have an outsized impact on the smartphone market, as the Nexus is an aging product in Samsung's lineup. Apple's stock closed down nearly 2 percent at $628.10.

However, the court's reasoning could make it much harder for companies that sue over patents get competitors' products pulled from the market, said Colleen Chien, a professor at Santa Clara Law school in Silicon Valley.

Such sales injunctions have been a key for companies trying to increase their leverage in courtroom patent fights.

"The Federal Circuit has said, 'Wait a minute,'" Chien said.

Apple declined to comment, while Samsung did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Apple scored a sweeping legal victory over Samsung in August when a U.S. jury found Samsung had copied critical features of the hugely popular iPhone and iPad and awarded Apple $1.05 billion in damages.

The Nexus phone was not included in that trial, but is part of a tandem case Apple filed against Samsung earlier this year.

District Judge Lucy Koh issued a pretrial injunction against the Nexus in June, based on an Apple patent for unified search capability. The appeals court then stayed that injunction until it could formally rule.

In its opinion on Thursday, the Federal Circuit reversed the injunction entirely, saying that Koh abused her discretion.

Apple failed to prove that consumers purchased the Samsung product because of the infringing technology, the appeals court ruled.

"It may very well be that the accused product would sell almost as well without incorporating the patented feature," the court wrote. "And in that case, even if the competitive injury that results from selling the accused device is substantial, the harm that flows from the alleged infringement (the only harm that should count) is not."

The court considered a single patent - one which allows the smartphone to search multiple data storage locations at once. For example, the smartphone could search the device's memory as well as the Internet with a single query.

The appeals court has sent the case back to Koh for reconsideration. A separate pretrial sales ban Apple had managed to win against Samsung - targeting the Galaxy Tab 10.1 - was dissolved earlier this month after Samsung won at trial on that patent.

Beyond the Nexus, Samsung also has a collection of new tablets and smartphones intended for launch before the holidays.

On Wednesday, Google executive chairman Eric Schmidt called the intensifying struggle between Apple and his company a "defining fight" for the future of the mobile industry.

The case in the Federal Circuit is Apple Inc vs. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al., 12-1507.

(Reporting By Diane Bartz; Editing by Gerald E. McCormick, Bernard Orr)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
jdsickler wrote:
Looks like you are going to actually have to innovate and compete, Apple.

Oct 11, 2012 11:35am EDT  --  Report as abuse
wjamison wrote:
@jdsickler: yes, apple will now have to innovate. brilliant jd. the problem is Apple innovates and others copy. got it?

Oct 11, 2012 1:05pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Broey77 wrote:
Good thing Apple didn’t come out with a LCD TV 5 years ago instead of phones. They would have trademarked a “Square” TV set with thin black border. (ouch would have kept almost all other current LCD makers out of the market based on this design patent) They could have trademarked such common sense items like putting a “Menu” button on the remote. Or other simple functional items.

There are movies and tv shows like Star Trek that showed people pinching to zoom in and out of photos, yet this is some “patented innovation”

Understand that the US Patent system will let you patent anything that has not been patented before and relies on the courts to invalidate a patent if someone has already come up with an idea. This is the reason large companies want to pass a new patent law that says it doesn’t matter who came up with the idea, it only matters who was the first to patent it.

Oct 11, 2012 2:23pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.