Romney would boost Pentagon spending, cut civilian workers: advisers

WASHINGTON Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:47pm EDT

1 of 10. U.S. Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney shakes hands with supporters during a campaign rally at the U.S. Cellular Center in Asheville, North Carolina October 11, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Shannon Stapleton

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republican Mitt Romney would accelerate spending on new Navy warships, cut the Pentagon's civilian workforce and speed up development of new weapons systems if he wins the 2012 presidential election, two advisers said on Thursday.

Dov Zakheim, who was Pentagon comptroller under President George W. Bush, and his son, Roger Zakheim, who is on leave as deputy staff director of the House Armed Services Committee, sketched out Romney's priorities at a meeting with reporters.

They said he would fund 15 warships a year -- up from nine in the latest request from the Obama administration -- as early as 2015; focus on development of a new bomber, and continue work on the Lockheed Martin Corp F-35 Joint Strike Fighter.

Romney insisted during the first presidential debate with President Barack Obama that he would increase military spending, but big weapons makers like Lockheed, Boeing Co, and Northrop Grumman Corp are anxiously awaiting details.

Defense stocks could get a short-term boost if Romney wins the election, said Byron Callan, an analyst with Capital Alpha. But he said even a Republican president would have to deal with the widening federal deficit and conservatives who are more concerned about cutting deficits than expanding defense.

"I don't know if I'd start a business model that starts to think about industry growth just yet," Callan said.


Romney has vowed to halt $500 billion in defense budget cuts due to start taking effect on January 2, reductions that would come on top of $487 billion in cuts to proposed spending that are already slated to take effect over the next decade.

The White House also opposes the cuts, but says it is up to Congress to find other ways to cut the deficit.

The advisers said Romney would dedicate 4 percent of U.S. gross domestic product to the Pentagon's base budget.

They also challenged Democratic estimates that Romney planned a $2 trillion buildup in military spending. "We're not going to come with this massive supplemental," Dov Zakheim said, noting that current military spending was about 4.2 percent, including funding for the war in Afghanistan.

Dov Zakheim identified two of Romney's closest advisers on defense as former Navy Secretary John Lehman and former Missouri Senator Jim Talent, both of whom have advocated for increased military spending. But he said Romney was someone who gathered a lot of disparate opinions before making up his own mind.

"If you look at the debate, look at the speeches, this is a guy that you can't pin down," he said, noting that Romney was not closely identified with neo-conservatives who opposed modest defense cuts proposed by former Defense Secretary Robert Gates.

He said the former governor of Massachusetts also interacted with two of the biggest U.S. defense contractors, Raytheon Co, which is based in Waltham, and BAE Systems, which employs many Massachusetts residents at its Nashua, New Hampshire plant, Zakheim said.

Both advisers said Romney would bring his business expertise to running the Pentagon, increasing competition, accelerating development efforts that often drag on for a decade or more, and using larger orders to lower unit costs.

For instance, they said, he plans to fund three Virginia-class submarines a year instead of two, a move that would be welcomed by shipbuilders General Dynamics Corp and Huntington Ingalls Industries Inc.

They said a growing economy would help fund the extra spending, and said Romney would also shift money out of "entitlement" programs in favor of defense.

At the same time, they said Romney would give companies more "predictability" by halting cuts in defense programs, cutting the Pentagon's expanding civilian workforce and what he has described as its "bloated bureaucracy," while also tackling rising military health care costs.

(Reporting by Andrea Shalal-Esa; Editing by Lisa Shumaker)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (3)
xyz2055 wrote:
Brilliant! More battle ships…exactly what enemy are we gearing up to defend ourselves against? We already spend 47% of what the world spends on defense and 7 times more than China (who is 2nd in Defense spending). We already have 11 “state of the art” super sized aircraft carriers. No other country on the planet has more than 1. China just built their 1st aircraft carrier. It’s a re-fitted 30 year old Russian vessel that to date has no planes on it. Hoping Willard saves a few bucks for cyber defense…that’s where future wars are more likely to be fought. The rest of the world has a plan…why should they spend big bucks on Air Craft Carriers, Submarines and State of the Art Aircraft…they’ll just sit tight until Willard bankrupts America and then buy those assets from us at bargain basement prices (pennies on the dollar). Could this guy possibly be any dumber.

Oct 11, 2012 8:33pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
Abulafiah wrote:
So basically, Romney’s plan to reduce unemployment and help the economy is to have a bigger government that spends more, and to have more workers paid for by the tax payer.

At last, we get some specifics!

Oct 12, 2012 3:09am EDT  --  Report as abuse
narratorTom wrote:
cutting civilian pentagon jobs is risky as well. the DoD still doesn’t have enough people in the acquisition workforce to ensure contracts are properly managed, which is what has led, time and time again, to programs costing far more than advertised, falling way behind schedule, and failing to deliver quality products from day one.

Oct 12, 2012 8:24am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.