EU tightens Iran sanctions, Ashton sees more talks

LUXEMBOURG Mon Oct 15, 2012 5:48pm EDT

An Iranian worker carries car parts as he walks near a production line of carmaker Iran Khodro, west of Tehran June 20, 2011. REUTERS/Morteza Nikoubazl

An Iranian worker carries car parts as he walks near a production line of carmaker Iran Khodro, west of Tehran June 20, 2011.

Credit: Reuters/Morteza Nikoubazl

Related Topics

LUXEMBOURG (Reuters) - European Union governments agreed further sanctions against Iran's banking, shipping and industrial sectors on Monday, cranking up financial pressure on Tehran in the hope of drawing it into serious negotiations on its nuclear program.

The decision by EU foreign ministers reflected mounting concerns over Iran's nuclear intentions and Israeli threats to attack Iranian atomic installations if a mix of sanctions and diplomacy fails to lead to a peaceful solution.

EU foreign policy chief Catherine Ashton said she hoped that turning up the heat on the Islamic Republic would persuade it to make concessions and that negotiations could resume "very soon".

"I absolutely do think there is room for negotiations," said Ashton, who represents the United States, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany in their on-and-off talks with Iran. "I hope we will be able to make progress very soon."

The new sanctions mark one of the EU's toughest moves against Iran to date and a significant change of policy for the 27-member bloc, which has hitherto focused largely on targeting specific people and companies with economic restrictions.

The EU has lagged the United States in imposing blanket industry bans because it says it is concerned not to punish ordinary Iranian citizens while inflicting pain on the Tehran government.

Iran maintains that its nuclear project has only peaceful energy purposes and has refused in three rounds of talks since April to scale back its uranium enrichment activity unless major economic sanctions are rescinded.

But governments in Europe and the United States, doubting Iran's preparedness for more than dilatory "talks about talks", are instead tightening the financial screws on Tehran and fears of a descent into a new Middle East war are growing.

German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle was more pessimistic than Ashton about the prospect that additional economic pain might drive Tehran - whose Islamic Revolution has long thrived on defiance of the West - to make concessions.

"Iran is still playing for time," he told reporters. "We don't see a sufficient readiness for substantial talks about the nuclear program."

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu kicked off his re-election campaign on Monday by saying Israel had new unspecified "capabilities" to act against Iran's nuclear threat.

British Prime Minister David Cameron in a speech in London called on Israel not to launch any unilateral action against Iran and allow more time for sanctions to have an impact.

"Iran is not just a threat to Israel. It is a threat to the world," Cameron said in a speech to the annual dinner of the United Jewish Israel Appeal.

"A negotiated settlement remains within Iran's grasp for now. But until they change course, we have a strategy of ever tougher sanctions," he added.


The widening sanctions regime is already doing significant damage to the Iranian economy, notably due to an oil embargo imposed by the European Union this year and new financial sanctions applied by the United States.

Riots have broken out in Tehran this month in protest at the collapse of the rial currency, which has lost some two-thirds of its value against the dollar in the past 15 months, stoking inflation that is now running at around 25 percent.

The new European measures include a general ban on financial transactions, with some exceptions for those involving humanitarian aid and provisions for legitimate trade.

Reversing existing policy, the ban will require European traders to ask governments for authorization before they can finance transactions in permitted goods. Previously, the EU broadly allowed trade unless goods were specifically banned.

"The EU's ban on financial transactions moves the Europeans to a more effective approach," said Mark Dubowitz of the Washington-based Foundation for the Defense of Democracies.

Trade will be hampered further by a new ban on European governments extending short-term trade guarantees, and by tougher restrictions on dealings with the Iranian central bank.

Other new measures include a ban on importing Iranian gas to Europe or providing any financing or transport of gas sales, as well as a prohibition on exporting graphite - used in steel-making - and metals to the Islamic Republic.

European companies will also be banned from providing storage or transport vessels for Iranian crude or petrochemical products, and from supporting Iranian ship-building.

At the core of Iran's dispute with world powers is its insistence that it has a right to enrich uranium and that economic sanctions should be lifted before it stops activities that could help it to achieve the capability to produce nuclear weapons.

The United States and European allies say Iran forfeited a right to enrich by concealing sensitive nuclear work from U.N. inspectors and stonewalling their long-running inquiry into suspected bomb research by Tehran.

They also believe that dropping sanctions first would remove any incentive for Iran to open up to inspectors and pursue a negotiated settlement.

Ashton last met Iran's chief negotiator Saeed Jalili in Istanbul in September for a session that her spokesman described as "useful and constructive".

(Additional reporting by Angelika Stricker in Brussels and Matt Falloon in London; editing by Rex Merrifield, Mark Heinrich and Michael Roddy)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (10)
The West should be putting these sanctions on the nuclear scofflaw state in that region; we should target the nation that touched off the alleged nuclear arms race: Israel, the “Jewish state”.

But, instead of confronting the bellicose scofflaws, the West is allowing Israel to call the shots here. It’s as if the lunatics are running the asylum. Israel’s illegal nuclear arsenal is the clear & present danger to humanity. Israel is issuing the military threats, not the Iranians.

Sanctions have never prevented a war, they do cause pain & suffering for the most vulnerable human beings in the targeted countries. Historically, after the sanctions fail, war is the usual result.

Oct 15, 2012 7:24am EDT  --  Report as abuse
dutch-boy wrote:
mc bob you need to white out most of your coments being thay are not true
there is evidence of nuclear weapons
iran has acted in good faith that is a laugh
it has not proven that it does not want a nuclear wepond
the us and eu are far from bullies
the Iaea has notr had a free run thuis is one of the major problems
the peole are suffering because the goverment of iran want a nuclear bomb and to stay in power just like NK
what you have posted is one sided and so far off the truth that its a laugh now that the eu has done some additional sancations the us will follow there has been many talks with iran doing nothing
also why do you bring Palestine into this that just shows your hate for Israel all iran needs to do is open there doors to the un and stoping playing games to waste time

Oct 15, 2012 10:17am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Dutch-boy has been sniffing oil-based paint fumes again?

Palestine is relevant in this discussion because it is the root cause of the violent Jihad against Israel’s supporters, defenders and arms suppliers.

Theodor Herzl’s 1896 manifesto, “Der Judenstaat”, though well-intentioned, has been extremely detrimental to humanity…it ranks up there with these other manifestos: “Das Kapital” and “Mein Kampf”. Race-based, faith-based colonialism in the 21st century just doesn’t cut it. Zionism IS a form of racism….and we should not be afraid to say so….sadly, the West in denial.

Oct 15, 2012 11:03am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.