Read
- IRS official refuses to answer questions at scandal hearing
|
- Global stocks, oil fall after Bernanke; dollar gains
|
- Oklahoma tornado victims astounded at how they survived
|
- CORRECTED-White House threatens veto of bill to bypass Obama on Keystone
- British soldier hacked to death in suspected Islamist attack
Reuters Photojournalism
Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography. See more | Photo caption
Message of humility
A religious fraternity in Rio considers the election of Pope Francis, a confirmation of their beliefs in poverty and simplicity. Slideshow
Sponsored Links
Romney narrows likability gap, Obama still leads on health: poll
(Reuters) - While Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney has erased President Barack Obama's overall poll lead, the Democrat remains ahead on some core issues such as healthcare and voters would still rather spend time with Obama than with Romney.
Romney, however, has narrowed the gap on "likability" as well as on how "presidential" he is compared to Obama.
The shifting numbers in a Reuters/Ipsos poll hint at where the two candidates are vulnerable in Tuesday's town hall debate in Hempstead, New York.
Romney's position in the horse race improved after the first debate in Denver on October 3, with the Republican drawing level in national polls. He has also taken a decisive lead on the federal government deficit: Americans now prefer his plan to Obama's by an eight-point margin, whereas Obama led by one in the week before the debate.
Obama now leads Romney by eight points on healthcare, and by nine on Medicare, down from pre-debate levels of 12 and 14, respectively. On one social issue that was not raised in Denver, gay marriage, Obama leads by 19 points, up by two points since before the debate.
Still, Romney's performance in Colorado did help narrow the gap in measures of personality and presentation, weakening what were previously unquestioned Obama leads.
The president's lead over Romney on "likability" was 22 points in polls conducted the week ending with October 14 - down from 28 before the debate - while his advantage on the question, "which candidate would be more fun to meet in person?" fell from 28 to a still-commanding 24 points.
Romney's biggest lead over Obama came when voters were asked which candidate is more a "man of faith": the Mormon Romney led Obama, a Protestant, by 40 percent to 29 percent, with 31 percent responding either "don't know" or "neither."
Obama's failure in Denver to deliver the soaring rhetoric some voters have come to expect from him caused his lead in the category of eloquence to drop by 12 points, to 16.
Perhaps even more painful for the president, Romney gained four points while Obama lost three on the question "which candidate is more presidential?" That narrowed the gap to just nine percentage points.
The data comes from a set of online polls that have been conducted since January. Sample size varies from question to question. Pre-debate numbers are from the week ending September 30, and post-debate numbers are from the week ending October 14.
(The Reuters/Ipsos database is now public and searchable here: tinyurl.com/reuterspoll)
(Reporting by Gabriel Debenedetti in New York; Editing by Claudia Parsons and Douglas Royalty)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
Romney’s questionable past and fickle plans for the future. You owe it to
yourself to know the real Romney before you make a choice; here it is:
http://www.rollingstone.com/po…
If the American people have become so fickle, so gullible, I am ashamed to be considered one of you! (And I’m a native Southerner, lily-white, Presbyterian Georgia boy!)
Is blatant, overt flip-flopping on one’s core beliefs now considered “likeable”? I think not!
If you make less than $300,000 a year and vote for Romney/Ryan, you are voting (and fighting) for YOUR OWN DISPOSSESSION!**
** Understand what that means. You are struggling for your own disenfranchisement, your own dispossession. Study the past. Study the fate of the Roman citizen/soldier of the mid and late Roman Republic!
You damn fools! Study the Past!




Follow Reuters