TEXT-Fitch assigns STORM 2012-V B.V. final ratings
Link to Fitch Ratings' Report: STORM 2012-V B.V.Fitch Ratings has assigned STORM 2012-V B.V.'s notes final ratings, as follows: EUR1,500,000,000 floating-rate senior class A mortgage-backed notes: 'AAAsf'; Outlook Stable EUR29,100,000 floating-rate mezzanine class B mortgage-backed notes: 'AA-sf'; Outlook Stable EUR23,800,000 floating-rate mezzanine class C mortgage-backed notes: 'BBB+sf'; Outlook Stable EUR26,800,000 floating-rate junior class D mortgage-backed notes: 'BB+sf'; Outlook Stable EUR15,800,000 floating-rate non-collateralised class E notes: 'BBsf'; Outlook Stable The transaction closed on 17 October 2012 and the final documents conformed to information already received. The final ratings are based on Fitch's assessment of the underlying collateral, available credit enhancement, the origination and underwriting procedures used by the seller and the servicer and the transaction's sound legal structure. The transaction is a true sale securitisation of Dutch residential mortgage loans, originated and sold by Obvion N.V. (not rated). Since 10 May 2012, Obvion has been 100% owned by Rabobank Group ('AA'/Stable/'F1+') and has an established track record as a mortgage lender and issuer of securitisations in the Netherlands. This is the 22nd transaction issued under the STORM series since 2003. Credit enhancement for the class A notes is 6.0%, which is provided by subordination and a non-amortising reserve fund equal to 1.0% at closing. The transaction benefits from an amortising liquidity facility of 2.0% at closing, a build-up of the reserve fund to 1.3% and an interest rate swap providing an excess margin of 50 basis points. The transaction is backed by a 3.6 year seasoned non-revolving portfolio consisting of prime residential mortgage loans with a weighted-average (WA) original loan-to-market-value of 86.0% and a WA debt-to-income ratio of 30.5%, both of which are typical for Fitch-rated Dutch RMBS transactions. The provisional pool composition is similar to the previous STORM transactions. The purchase of further advances into the pool is allowed after closing subject to stringent conditions. Both the STORM series and Obvion's loan book have shown stable performance in terms of arrears and losses. The 90+ days arrears of the previous Fitch-rated transactions have been mostly lower than the Dutch Index throughout the life of the deals. Rabobank fulfils a number of roles, including collection account provider, guaranteed investment contract provider, liquidity facility provider and commingling guarantor and therefore this transaction relies strongly on the creditworthiness of Rabobank. In addition, Rabobank acts as back-up swap counterparty through its London branch. Fitch considers that the swap provides a certain degree of liquidity and credit support in this transaction and the replacement of the swap would likely be at a high cost, due to the nature of the swap structure, which in turn may affect the interest waterfall. Although the notification trigger is set below the 'A' level, the agency did not consider the risk of a loss of funds due to commingling or disruption of payments in the cash flow analysis, as Fitch considers that this risk is mitigated by means of a commingling guarantee provided by Rabobank. In addition, the transaction is not exposed to the risk of deposit set-off or other claims. Fitch considers further set-off risks in this transaction are minimal due to the structural mitigants in place in relation to construction deposit, savings and investment set-off as well as the limited proportion of insurance loans included in the provisional portfolio. For the 6.4% insurance loans included in the provisional pool, Fitch incorporated in its analysis the risk that borrowers might exercise set-off following the failure of insurance providers. Obvion provided Fitch with loan-by-loan information on the provisional portfolio as of 30 September 2012. All of the data fields included in the pool cut were of good quality and Obvion provided additional information for mortgage loans based on the income of two borrowers. Fitch reviewed an Agreed Upon Procedures report regarding the data provided by the arranger. The agency believes the sample size, the relevance of the tested fields, and the limited number of material error findings suggests the originator provided an acceptable quality of data. In addition, Fitch relied on its own file review undertaken for a prior transaction (STORM 2012-IV) on 25 July 2012, which consisted of 15 loans selected from the provisional transaction portfolio. This was considered a very good proxy for STORM 2012-V, given the similar asset characteristics and recent timing. The agency discovered no errors or unexpected results. Fitch relied on repossession data that represented loans foreclosed between 2004 and 2010. Further foreclosure data was also provided up to 2012, although the omission of original valuation information reduced the usefulness of this data set. Based on the repossession data analysis, the performance was in line with Fitch's assumptions; therefore, Fitch did not adjust its QSA, market value decline or foreclosure timing assumptions. To analyse the CE levels, Fitch evaluated the collateral using its default model, details of which can be found in the reports entitled "EMEA Residential Mortgage Loss Criteria", dated 7 June 2012, "EMEA RMBS Criteria Addendum - Netherlands", dated 14 June 2012, available at www.fitchratings.com. The agency assessed the transaction cash flows using default and loss severity assumptions under various structural stresses including prepayment speeds and interest rate scenarios. The cash flow tests showed that each class of notes could withstand loan losses at a level corresponding to the related stress scenario without incurring any principal loss or interest shortfall and can retire principal by the legal final maturity. Fitch's stress and rating sensitivity analysis is detailed in the new issue report which will shortly be available at www.fitchratings.com. Additional information is available at www.fitchratings.com. The ratings above were solicited by, or on behalf of, the issuer, and therefore, Fitch has been compensated for the provision of the ratings. In addition to the source(s) of information identified in the 'EMEA RMBS Criteria Addendum - Netherlands', this action was additionally informed by information provided by the originator Obvion and the arranger Rabobank. Applicable criteria "EMEA Residential Mortgage Loss Criteria", dated 7 June 2012, "EMEA RMBS Criteria Addendum - Netherlands", dated 14 June 2012, "EMEA RMBS Master Rating Criteria", dated 7 June 2012, "EMEA RMBS Cash Flow Analysis Criteria" dated 7 June 2012, "EMEA Cash RMBS Structural Overview", dated 6 May 2009, "Counterparty Criteria for Structured Finance Transactions", dated 30 May 2012, and "Global Stuctured Finance Rating Criteria", dated 6 June 2012, are available at www.fitchratings.com. Applicable Criteria and Related Research: EMEA Residential Mortgage Loss Criteria EMEA Criteria Addendum - Netherlands - Mortgage Loss and Cash Flow Assumptions EMEA RMBS Master Rating Criteria EMEA RMBS Cash Flow Analysis Criteria EMEA Cash RMBS Structural Overview Counterparty Criteria for Structured Finance Transactions Global Structured Finance Rating Criteria
- U.S. nurse defies Maine's Ebola quarantine, takes bike ride |
- Clashes erupt as Israeli police kill Palestinian suspected of shooting Jewish far-rightist
- Apple's Cook: 'I'm proud to be gay'
- SoftBank's humanoid robot lands job as Nescafe salesman
- Ukraine, Russia, EU likely to agree gas supply deal on Thursday: officials