Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Tornado chasers

Storm chasers brave danger and debris as they try to capture photos of tornadoes' destructive power.  Slideshow 

Photo

Running while blind

Blind or visually impaired students compete in blind track and field tournament.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Obama takes Romney to task on Libya in smack-down moment

U.S. President Barack Obama (L) listens as Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney answers a question during the second presidential debate in Hempstead, New York, October 16, 2012. REUTERS/Rick Wilking

U.S. President Barack Obama (L) listens as Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney answers a question during the second presidential debate in Hempstead, New York, October 16, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Rick Wilking

WASHINGTON | Wed Oct 17, 2012 1:38am EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - In the defining moment of a testy debate, President Barack Obama lashed into Mitt Romney on Tuesday over the Republican's criticism of his handling of a deadly attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya and sought to cast him as unfit to become commander-in-chief.

Moving to regain lost ground after a weak performance in the first presidential debate, Obama fought back against his rival's accusations that he had played down the September 11 assault by Islamist militants in Benghazi that killed the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans.

Romney, who dominated the candidates' previous encounter, appeared stunned as Obama launched a finger-wagging counterattack over an issue that has become a flashpoint with just three weeks to go in a presidential race considered too close to call.

The exchange came near the end of a debate dominated mostly by arguments over the economy, jobs and taxes, considered voters' main concerns in the November 6 election.

Romney and his aides have sought to use the Benghazi incident - as well as anti-American unrest in other parts of the Arab world - to dent Obama's national security credentials and accuse him of pursuing a failed Middle East policy.

But Obama came out swinging in their second debate at Hofstra University in Hempstead, New York, accusing Romney of exploiting the Benghazi attack in an effort to score "offensive" political points.

"While we were still dealing with our diplomats being threatened, Governor Romney put out a press release, trying to make political points, and that's not how a commander-in-chief operates" Obama said, referring to the Republican's initial criticism of the administration's response before the full extent of the bloodshed was known.

TESTY EXCHANGE

Obama and Romney argued testily in front of a group of undecided voters over whether Obama had come out fast enough in describing the Libya attack as terrorism, and the president appeared to get the better of his opponent.

"I stood in the Rose Garden and I told the American people and the world that we are going to find out exactly what happened, that this was an act of terror," Obama said.

Romney was incredulous. He challenged Obama's assertion, apparently unaware of Obama's remarks the morning after the Benghazi attack.

"Get the transcript," Obama told Romney in the closest thing to a smack-down moment in the 90-minute debate.

"He did, in fact, sir," moderator Candy Crowley said, siding with Obama. "He did call it an act of terror."

A transcript of the Rose Garden appearance that day shows Obama said: "...no acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation."

But despite that comment, some of Obama's top aides had initially attributed the Benghazi violence to protests over an anti-Islam film and said it was not premeditated, before finally acknowledging much later that it was a terrorist attack.

And Obama, in a September 24 taping of an appearance on ABC's "The View" program, also seemed to hedge when he was asked whether Benghazi was an act of terrorism. He said it "wasn't just a mob action" but pointed to an ongoing investigation.

Obama said for the first time on Tuesday he was "ultimately responsible" for the safety and security of the Americans killed in the attack. "I'm the president and I'm always responsible," he said.

Seeking to recover from his apparent misstep, Romney pointed to the administration's shifting explanations of the events in Benghazi, suggesting it had been an attempt to mislead.

"It took them a long time to say this was a terrorist act by a terrorist group," he said.

In the months before the deadly attack in Benghazi, Libya, U.S. and allied intelligence agencies warned the White House and State Department repeatedly that the region was becoming an increasingly dangerous vortex for jihadist groups loosely linked or sympathetic to al Qaeda, according to U.S. officials.

Despite those warnings and bold public displays by Islamist militants around Benghazi, embassies in the region were advised to project a sense of calm and normalcy in the run-up to the anniversary of the September 11 attacks in the United States.

Romney's supporters have accused the administration of being slow to label the attack as terrorism to avoid detracting from the president's campaign narrative of being a strong world leader who put al Qaeda on the path to defeat.

Polls have shown national security a strong point for Obama with voters, especially after the killing of Osama bin Laden.

Going on the offensive, Obama sought to depict Romney, who has little foreign policy experience and has stumbled during his occasional forays on the world stage, as ill-prepared to take on the role of commander-in-chief in a dangerous world.

Romney fired back, saying the Benghazi incident "calls into question the president's whole policy in the Middle East."

"Look what's happening in Syria, in Egypt, now in Libya. Consider the distance between ourselves and Israel," Romney said. "We have Iran four years closer to a nuclear bomb."

(Reporting By Matt Spetalnick; Editing by Alistair Bell and Eric Walsh)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (21)
Maxwells wrote:
The following quote from President Obama’s Rose Garden speech clearly shows that Mr Obama was in fact suggesting that the Youtube video was responsible for the attack in Benghazi.

“Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts.”

Oct 17, 2012 1:22am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Romney, Ryan, the House Republicans, and others in the TGOP are trying to turn an issue of how to prevent a reoccurrence of the Benghazi tragedy into a witch hunt and an attack on President Obama, pure and simple. The whole issue has now become a concerted effort by the TGOP to score political points by politicizing this tragedy.

To take this tragedy and turn it into an attack on the President and a negative narrative about President Obama’s foreign policy is absurd. When compared to the 1983 terrorist bombing of U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut, Lebanon which killed 241 Marines when Ronald Reagan was president, the Benghazi tragedy is a substantially less egregious oversight in discovering and recognizing a terrorist threat. The Democrats didn’t use the Beirut disaster as an indictment of Reagan or his foreign policy at that time and I’ll bet other Americans didn’t either.

The murder of the U.S. Ambassador and three other Americans is a terrible tragedy and the perpetrators must be brought to justice. The lessons learned from the Benghazi tragedy should be put to use to prevent a similar tragedy in the future. The U.S. State Department is conducting an investigation headed by Thomas Pickering and former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Admiral Mullens. This is the investigation which will give us the answers to prevent this type of tragedy in the future, not the fully politicized rants of partisans.

Let’s please put this Benghazi act of terror in a rational perspective, free of politics. The U.S. has had at least 10,000 citizens (combatant & civilians) killed in terror attacks and in the ‘war on terror’ in the past eleven years. The battle against terror will continue and, unfortunately, it is likely more tragedy will occur as the battle continues.

Oct 17, 2012 1:23am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Welred wrote:
Smackdown? Did you watch the debate? Apparently so, as your article reflects what really happened: Romney challenged the President on Benghazi, the President LIED and said that he always acknowledged it was an act of terror and Candy Crowley affirmed the LIE as TRUE! THAT was the real headline here: President makes blatant lie and biased moderator goes along with it! As your article relates, the President took OVER TWO WEEKS to admit that the story his administration had been peddling (about the attack being a spontaneous reaction to the dumb Islam video) was a lie and that, in fact, the attack was premeditated terrorism. The President omitted the part where EVERY intelligence agency has so far said that the Administration DID know about the requests for extra security and DID know that the attack was premeditated. President Obama failed to acknowledge that VP Biden not only made the same lies in his debate, but that the President applauded those lies! The bottom line is that your headline is so wrong — and your own article shows how wrong it is — that the only reasonable conclusion is that your internal biases prevented you from writing a journalistic headline and, instead, drove you to write an editorialized, inaccurate one. Shame. The best part, though, is that it looks like Romney will squeak this election out. Thank God.

Oct 17, 2012 2:27am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.