Locked in tight race, Obama and Romney trade jokes at dinner

NEW YORK Fri Oct 19, 2012 12:22am EDT

1 of 4. U.S. President Barack Obama and Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney (R) are pictured on stage at the 67th Annual Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation dinner in New York October 18, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Jason Reed

Related Topics

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Locked in a tense race with time running out, President Barack Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney took time off to exchange light-hearted jabs and make fun of each other on Thursday in a joint appearance at a high-profile charity dinner.

Two days after a brutal debate in which they exchanged verbal blows and stalked each other on stage, Obama and Romney greeted each other warmly, dressed formally in white tie and tails.

But the combativeness of the campaign trail was ever-present as the two foes gave back-to-back speeches at the 67th annual Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner.

Romney, speaking first, said Obama, who wants to increase taxes on the wealthy to help fund government programs, must have had some thoughts as he looked out at the crowd of wealthy people at the dinner.

"You have to wonder what he's thinking: So little time, so much to redistribute," he said.

Obama, when it was his turn, made fun of Romney's vast wealth.

"Earlier I went shopping at some stores in Midtown. I understand Governor Romney went shopping for some stores in Midtown," he said.

The Al Smith dinner is a glittering affair at the Waldcrf-Astoria hotel where New York's high society dined on poached lobster and rack of lamb and contributed $5 million for various children's charities.

Obama and Romney, facing a third and final debate Monday in Florida, sat close to each other at the dinner, separated only by Cardinal Timothy Dolan, the archbishop of New York who spoke at both the Republican and Democratic conventions in late August and early September.

The event is an annual speaking opportunity for presidents or president aspirants to test their comic skills with self-deprecating jokes usually written up by clever speechwriters.

Obama made light of his much-panned performance at his first debate with Romney on October 3. He said at the second debate, where he was judged the winner, he had been well-rested because of the "nice long nap I had at the first debate."


Romney also was self-deprecating, noting that the way he prepared for the debate was to "refrain from alcohol for 65 years." As a practicing Mormon, the former Massachusetts governor abstains from alcohol.

Obama, who frequently credits himself with ordering the mission that led to the death of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden in 2011, noted that the last debate is about foreign policy.

"Spoiler alert: We got bin Laden!" he said.

Romney tweaked Obama on the high jobless rate, saying its recent small decline meant only one thing: "You're better off now than you were four weeks ago."

Obama said he and Romney have some things in common, like their unusual middle names. Romney's is Mitt. "I wish I could use my middle name," said Obama, whose middle name is Hussein.

If there was one thing they had in common, it was their ability to make fun of Vice President Joe Biden, Obama's gaffe-prone No. 2.

Obama said he sometimes hears that he is getting old and has lost a step and when he does, he says, "Settle down, Joe, I'm trying to run a Cabinet meeting."

Romney said when Biden speaks, it usually is to Romney's benefit, so much so that whenever his remarks are on TV it should be accompanied by a recorded message like those used in campaign ads: "I'm Mitt Romney, and I approve this message."

Obama got in a jab at the Republicans' use of Hollywood legend Clint Eastwood at Romney's convention. Eastwood was panned for talking to an empty chair on stage as if Obama was sitting in it.

"Please take your seats," Obama told the crowd, "or else Clint Eastwood will yell at them."

The tone of the evening was set with introductory remarks by Al Smith IV, who could not resist teasing Romney for saying at the debate that he sorted through "binders full of women" in trying to put together a diverse cabinet as governor of Massachusetts.

"I want to say a special welcome to all of the accomplished women here tonight. It's good to see you made it out of those binders," Smith said to laughter.

The dinner started in 1945 in tribute to a former Democratic New York governor Smith, who lost the 1928 presidential election to Republican Herbert Hoover in a landslide.

Among the 1,600 guests were representatives from two of New York's major industries - media and Wall Street money. Spotted in the crowd were ABC television talk show host Katie Couric and Fox News executive Roger Ailes, as well as Steve Schwarzman, chief executive of private equity firm Blackstone Group, and Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan.

(The story corrects spelling of Schwarzman's last name in final paragraph.)

(Editing by Bill Trott)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
lie_detector wrote:
This is the reality of Washington – a bunch of chess pieces all being moved by unseen hands. So its been throughout most of history, and I suppose that’s how it will always be. Basically, when you cast your vote you’re choosing the lesser of two evils. In this particular election Romney is clearly the smaller devil. He’s got his own money and most of his friends are rich, so he doesn’t NEED your money. In fact, he needs you to start spending money to jump-start the economy. The only way you create wealth is through the private sector, and that means getting people back to work. We have no idea how many of his promises Romney will be willing or able to keep. But we know how many Obama has kept: almost none. The only ones he HAS kept are the ones you wouldn’t want him to, and he’s done it by ignoring the law and the Constitution. Its a pretty safe bet that Romney will have a lot more respect for the office of the president than that. Remember to ask yourself as you prepare to cast that ballot: who do you *really* want in power? Someone who will try to give you what you want by lying, cheating and breaking the law to do it, or someone you may not agree with but who will work mostly within the system like he’s supposed to?

Oct 19, 2012 4:27am EDT  --  Report as abuse
Sensibility wrote:
Obama, on The Daily Show, also said four Americans getting killed in Lybya was “not optimal”.


Mr. Obama, do you know what’s not optimal? Your entire Presidency:

-Libya a hotbed of anti-Americanism
-anemic economic growth
-unemployment not keeping up with population growth
-real wages for the middle class falling for four years
-environmental regulations being gutted left and right
-no immigration reform
-no education reform
-not even a conversation on Medicare and Social Security
-minimal improvement in gay rights
-Syria burning
-China cheating
-Gitmo still open
-Russia threatening democracy at home and abroad

Oct 19, 2012 7:51am EDT  --  Report as abuse
USAPragmatist wrote:
Once again another perfect example of why Romney is not Presidential material. He disrespected the President over and over again with some of his ‘jokes’. Of all the jokes they told, only 3 of Obama’s where directed at the Romney/Ryan ticket while the rest were self-deprecating. While Romney had 9 that were directed at Obama/Biden and 1 or 2 that where self-deprecating. It really shows how Romney thinks that he knows it all and is beyond reproach, not to mention the lack of humility he has. Imagine how he would treat foreign heads of state if he shows this much lack of respect for the office of the Presidency.

A side note, Obama’s jokes where A LOT funnier, IMO.

Oct 19, 2012 1:03pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.