Housing pop is no bubble: Trulia CEO
At the Reuters Tech Summit, Trulia chief executive Pete Flint says private equity investors are starting to pull back from buying U.S. real estate, while overseas buyers are coming on strong once again. Video
Read
- Angelina Jolie stunt double sues News Corp over hacking
- Kanye West wins over critics with 'daring' new album 'Yeezus'
- Shares choppy, dollar steady as Fed meets
- Massachusetts police search NFL player's home in homicide probe: report
- Journalist who brought down U.S. general is killed in Los Angeles car crash
Reuters Photojournalism
Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography. See more | Photo caption
The Afghan Army
The many faces of the Afghan National Army, which has taken over security of the country from NATO. Slideshow
Sponsored Links
Samsung wins preliminary round over Apple patent
WASHINGTON |
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, which is battling Apple Inc across the globe for dominance of the smartphone market, dealt the California company a setback by winning a preliminary invalidation of a key Apple patent, according to a court filing.
The fight is related to Apple's war against Google, whose Android software powers many of Samsung's devices.
Samsung said in a filing late Monday that examiners at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) had taken a second look at an Apple patent and decided that it should not have been granted. The patent allows a user with a touch screen to bounce back to the image on the screen if the user goes beyond the edge.
The patent was one of six that Samsung was found to have infringed by a jury in a California federal court in August. It awarded Apple $1.05 billion in damages.
The case is being appealed, and Samsung is pursuing other challenges such as requests for the PTO to reexamine the patent.
Scott Daniels, a litigation partner at Westerman, Hattori, Daniels & Adrian LLP who is not part of the case, said the PTO's preliminary invalidation is not the end of the battle over this specific patent.
He said the patent remains valid through the appeals process.
The case in U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, is Apple Inc v. Samsung Electronics Co Ltd et al, No. 11-1846.
(Reporting By Diane Bartz;editing by Sofina Mirza-Reid)
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
The bounce-back ( aka. “rubber-banding” — nice branding attempt, there ) feature is just snapping by a different name, which has been around for ages. One can either snap to a target point from within the normal range of positions, or from outside the usual range, in which case we get this “bounce-back” behavior, naturally. There is nothing new or clever about, and it’s a shame Apple even thought to pass this off as an invention worth patenting.
Slide-to-unlock, and rounded corners should be next, I hope!




Follow Reuters