Russia demands expulsion of reporters, envoys over U.N. leaks

UNITED NATIONS Wed Oct 24, 2012 5:13pm EDT

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - Russia slammed leaks to the media from a closed-door Security Council briefing on Syria on Wednesday, saying diplomats and journalists involved should be stripped of U.N. accreditation for the release of confidential information.

Russian U.N. Ambassador Vitaly Churkin was angry that some diplomats conveyed to Reuters that the U.N.-Arab League mediator for the Syrian conflict, Lakhdar Brahimi, told the 15-member council that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad had accepted Brahimi's plan for an Eid holiday ceasefire.

"It's a shame that somebody's feeding information, or disinformation, to Reuters from the consultation room of the Security Council. This is a scandalous thing, we have seen this before. I hope they are paid well," Churkin told reporters.

Reuters adhered to the highest standards in reporting this story, a company spokesperson said. "It is fair and accurate and we stand by it," the spokesperson said.

Despite his frustration at the leak, Churkin confirmed the Reuters article in comments to reporters at the Security Council media stakeout after the briefing on the 19-month Syrian conflict had finished.

Churkin, a former Soviet government spokesman, also said Russia had raised the issue during the meeting and asked the U.N. secretariat to investigate.

"We believe that this is a gross violation of professional ethics so we'll be fighting that, if need be by stripping those who are resorting to this of U.N. accreditation," Churkin said.

"We don't want to have another Murdoch soap opera in the United Nations," he said, apparently referring to the phone-hacking scandal that engulfed News Corp Chairman and CEO Rupert Murdoch's British media empire.

Other Security Council delegations, including the United States, have complained in the past about leaks from closed meetings to the media, though none has called for reporters or diplomats to lose their accreditations over it.

The U.N. secretariat had no immediate reaction.

"COMPLETELY LOST IT"

Around 30,000 people have been killed in Syria since a government crackdown on peaceful pro-democracy protests in March 2011 spiraled into civil war.

The United States and European council members blame Russia, a staunch ally and key arms supplier for Assad's government, and China for the council's deadlock on the conflict. Moscow and Beijing have vetoed three resolutions condemning Assad and reject the idea of sanctioning his government.

A diplomat present at the Syria briefing, who was speaking on the condition of anonymity, said Churkin had told the council it was illegal to report on confidential consultations.

"He completely lost it," the diplomat told Reuters. Other envoys confirmed his remarks.

Robert Mahoney, deputy director of the Committee to Protect Journalists said confidential sources were the key to reporters covering various beats, including international diplomacy.

"Journalists and news organizations should not be intimidated for doing their job, especially when covering organizations whose mandate is to defend freedom of expression," Mahoney said in a statement.

Churkin suggested that press freedom should not be unlimited.

"I respect freedom of the media and I think we need to be open, but the pay-off for that is inevitably that the media needs to respect the confidentiality of the work of the security council," Churkin said.

Media watchdogs have raised concerns about media freedom in post-Soviet Russia. At least 32 journalists have been murdered in Russia since 1992, including the 2006 killing of Kremlin critic Anna Politkovskaya, and most have gone unsolved, the Committee to Protect Journalists says.

It lists Russia as the ninth-worst country in the world for the treatment of journalists.

(Editing by David Storey)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
Free_Pacific wrote:
Maybe it would be better if the UN was based in Moscow. Then they can just arrest, detain and torture jouranlists as they step off the plane. Putin would be ever so happy.

Oct 24, 2012 6:25pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
neahkahnie wrote:
For once, I am in agreement with Churkin as it respects confidentiality. It’s OK to “leak” stories, but when journalists are given access to confidential matters, discretion is wise since it involves the lives of people. Hold off for a day or so. Press freedom is not lost here. Lives may be. Many times the Washington Post and NY Times have stories that are well-sourced and are scoops. The editors or higher call the government and tell them what they have. Sometimes government says, “Hold off for a bit.” Or , “Don’t print that.” The paper then makes the decision based on quiet discussions. Maybe this should have happened here.

Oct 24, 2012 7:58pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.