Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Devastated by tornado

A huge tornado tears through the Oklahoma City suburb of Moore, killing dozens.  Slideshow 

Photo

Nuclear tsunami wall

Safety upgrades designed to prevent a repeat of the Fukushima disaster.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Obama says deficit reduction panel right on revenues, wrong on defense cuts

Related Topics

U.S. President Barack Obama points to the crowd as he arrives for a campaign rally in Cleveland, Ohio October 25, 2012. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

U.S. President Barack Obama points to the crowd as he arrives for a campaign rally in Cleveland, Ohio October 25, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Kevin Lamarque

WASHINGTON | Fri Oct 26, 2012 9:53pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama said on Friday a bipartisan panel's deficit reduction recommendation went too far on spending cuts, especially for defense, but set the right tone by also proposing revenue increases.

Obama said the plan put forward by the bipartisan Simpson-Bowles commission - and held out by some as a model compromise that distributes the pain evenly - cut defense spending too deeply.

"They wanted ... defense cuts that were steeper than I felt comfortable with as commander in chief," he said.

The president, who is in a tight re-election battle with Republican challenger Mitt Romney, said he would be eager to re-engage congressional Republicans in negotiations to achieve a broad deficit reduction deal right away. A deal could be accomplished in as little as four months, he said.

"I've said to folks, I'll wash (House Speaker) John Boehner's car, I'll walk (Republican Senate leader) Mitch McConnell's dog, I'll do whatever is required to get this done," Obama said in an interview with radio host Michael Smerconish that was released on Friday.

"The key that the American people want from us right now is for us to tackle some big challenges that we face in a common-sense, balanced, sensible way," the president said.

Whatever the outcome of the November 6 election, the United States faces a sharp fiscal tightening at the end of the year. Unless Congress and the administration act, $109 billion in spending cuts are due to go into effect and tax rates will rise.

Both Obama and Republicans say they want to avoid the "fiscal cliff." But Democrats want to limit spending cuts in social welfare programs and Republicans object to letting tax rates rise for those earning above $250,000 a year.

Obama also said eliminating the popular tax deductions for interest paid on home loans or for charitable gifts, as the proposal suggests, goes "too far."

His own proposal took the basic framework of the Simpson-Bowles plan and "tweaked it," he said.

Obama raised the possibility this week that if re-elected, he would take another run at the "grand bargain" that eluded Washington in 2011. The goal of such a deal would be to achieve $4 trillion in deficit reduction over 10 years.

(Reporting by Mark Felsenthal; Editing by Peter Cooney)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
xyz2055 wrote:
NO ONE is serious about spending cuts. PERIOD! the “Fiscal Cliff”. Isn’t even a good start. It cuts $120B out of a $3T budget for 2013 and the media is painting it like it’s the end of the world.

Oct 26, 2012 12:10am EDT  --  Report as abuse
dmanning wrote:
I agree. Fiscal conservatives are anything but fiscally conservative, and are intent on wearing the mantle of deficit hawks while advocating policies of corporate welfare, budget-busting increases in defense spending, and a slack and regressive tax code. Meanwhile the bulk of the Democratic party is unwilling to see how major reforms are necessary to tame this debt problem, and government spending has to be brought into line, and quickly.

This purported fiscal cliff would only be a sliver of deficit reduction, and even this is an anethema to both parties. Despite the fact it is the nearest to agreement either could get. So you have a situation where every politician in Washington is scrambling to undo their own budget device, which was itself a pitiful and watered down measure.

This has gotten stupid.

Oct 27, 2012 10:29am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.