Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Rage in Brazil

Mass protests erupt in the biggest cities of Brazil.  Slideshow 

Photo

The Afghan Army

The many faces of the Afghan National Army, which has taken over security of the country from NATO.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Colorado judge denies theater rampage victims access to criminal files

Related Topics

DENVER | Tue Oct 30, 2012 9:13pm EDT

DENVER (Reuters) - Survivors of the shooting rampage that left 12 moviegoers slain during the showing of a Batman film in Colorado lost a bid in court on Tuesday to obtain sealed evidence in the criminal case for review in their civil suit against the theater chain.

The request for access to law enforcement's investigative files was brought by three individuals wounded in the massacre who have sued Cinemark USA in U.S. district court in Denver, accusing the company of lax theater security.

A total of 58 people were injured, in addition to the 12 people killed, when a gunman opened fire on fellow Cinemark patrons in the Denver suburb of Aurora as they watched a midnight screening of "The Dark Knight Rises."

The suspect, James Holmes, a 24-year-old former neuroscience graduate student, is charged with dozens of counts of murder and attempted murder stemming from the shooting spree.

Lawyers for survivors suing the theater chain went before the judge presiding over Holmes' murder case asking for permission to review arrest warrant affidavits and transcripts or tapes of emergency 911 calls from the July 20 rampage.

But Arapahoe County District Court Judge William Sylvester ruled that until a hearing is held to determine if there is enough evidence to bind Holmes over for trial. "It is particularly important that such information not be disclosed," he said.

Sylvester also said that because the 911 calls remain in the hands of the Aurora police department, and are not part of the court's official case file, he was not at liberty to immediately overrule the city's decision refusing to grant access to the documents.

Both prosecutors and defense attorneys for Holmes opposed opening the files to the victims.

In a motion seeking dismissal of the federal lawsuit, lawyers for Texas-based Cinemark said its employees could not have anticipated having to deal with "a madman's mass murder" at the theater.

"It would be patently unfair, and legally unsound, to impose on Cinemark, a private business in the entertainment industry, the duty and burden to have foreseen and prevented the criminal equivalent of a meteor falling from the sky," the motion said.

(Editing by Steve Gorman and Lisa Shumaker)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
carmensanchez wrote:
Such an interesting article! I have always been interested in the role of criminal defense austin tx in a case like this one. Thanks for the the information.

Nov 05, 2012 6:13pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.