Mars rover still sniffing for elusive methane

Fri Nov 2, 2012 5:19pm EDT

A sample of Martian soil delivered by the robotic arm on NASA's Mars rover Curiosity to the rover's observation tray for the first time is pictured in this October 16, 2012 NASA handout photo obtained by Reuters October 20, 2012. REUTERS/NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS/Handout.

A sample of Martian soil delivered by the robotic arm on NASA's Mars rover Curiosity to the rover's observation tray for the first time is pictured in this October 16, 2012 NASA handout photo obtained by Reuters October 20, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/NASA/JPL-Caltech/MSSS/Handout.

Related Topics

CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla., Nov 2 - Initial analysis of the atmosphere of Mars from NASA's rover Curiosity has shown no sign of methane, a gas detected previously by remote sensors, researchers said on Friday.

On Earth, more than 90 percent of the methane in the atmosphere results from living organisms and its presence in the Martian atmosphere, first detected in 2003, raised the prospect of microbial life on the planet.

Although no methane was detected during Curiosity's first detailed atmospheric analysis, scientists working under the auspices of the U.S. space agency plan to keep looking.

"The search goes on," Curiosity scientist Paul Mahaffy, from NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland, told reporters on Friday.

In addition to chemically analyzing soil and rocks, Curiosity is equipped to sample and study gases in the planet's thin atmosphere.

The rover's onboard laboratory looked for methane in concentrations as small as five parts per billion. Scientists so far have no explanation as to why Curiosity has found no methane, when orbiting probes and ground-based telescopes have previously found evidence of the gas on Mars.

As well as being produced by living organisms, methane is also generated by geological activity.

Methane would not have to be released at Curiosity's landing site inside Gale Crater for the rover to detect it, according to atmospheric chemist Sushil Atreya of the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor.

"If there is a source of methane elsewhere, it does not take very long for it to get distributed over the planet - about three months," Atreya said.

"As we monitor (for) methane over time, we may be able to say more about the possibility about any sources in the Gale Crater region," he said.

Measurements of other atmospheric gases have proven more fruitful.

An analysis of carbon, argon and other isotopes, which are variations of particular chemical elements, indicates that Mars, as suspected, has lost significant amounts of its atmosphere to space over time.

"The gases in the current atmosphere are a product of Mars' entire history," said Curiosity scientist Laurie Leshin of the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, New York.

The goal of the two-year, $2.5 billion Curiosity mission is to determine whether Mars, which is cold and dry today, ever had the chemical and environmental conditions to support and preserve microbial life.

"Did Mars once have abundant flowing water, and if so why is the climate so cold and the atmosphere so thin today as to preclude this?" Leshin said.

"By studying today's atmosphere, we can gain clues to how Mars' environment has changed," she said.

Curiosity, which landed on Mars in August, is NASA's first astrobiology mission since the 1970s-era Viking probes.

(Editing by Tom Brown and David Brunnstrom)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (2)
VonHell wrote:
If any mission on Mars if going to happen… it is not obvious that the only place fit for a colony is around the pole cap?… to explore the frozen water… the only err “true” source of water… but that so far no one confirmed directly if there is water or not just frozen CO2… you could obtain water for drinking, O2 to breath and H2 for fuel… or even the CO2 could be usefull…
Some say that with a nuclear reactor you could heat the red earth to extract water molecules trapped inside the dry powder to drink… or even melt the iron oxide to obtain oxigen to breath… but that sounds non reliable and unrealistic…
I feel sad when i see the rover inside that hole… feels like the only evidence of life it will find are contaminant spores brought from Earth…

Nov 02, 2012 11:11pm EDT  --  Report as abuse
americanguy wrote:
Bogus readings then and now.
A total waste of money.

Nov 04, 2012 2:02pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.