Fort Hood shooting victims sue government, accused shooter

SAN ANTONIO Mon Nov 5, 2012 6:00pm EST

Related Topics

SAN ANTONIO (Reuters) - Families and victims of a mass shooting in 2009 at the Fort Hood military base in Texas filed a wrongful death suit on Monday against the U.S. government, the accused gunman and the estate of an alleged al Qaeda leader.

The 148 plaintiffs are seeking damages and a ruling that the rampage was a terrorist attack. The finding would clear the way for them to receive benefits.

Major Nidal Hasan, an Army psychiatrist, faces 13 charges of premeditated murder and 32 counts of attempted premeditated murder for the November 5, 2009, attack on soldiers preparing to deploy to Iraq.

Survivors have expressed frustration about repeated delays over the past three years in bringing Hasan to trial. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces indefinitely postponed Hasan's court-martial last month pending further review.

The suit filed in U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia alleges that Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and other officials disregarded the safety of soldiers and civilians at Fort Hood. It also alleges that they allowed Hasan to be in a position to open fire on the troops despite knowing he was a "radical extremist."

"The government seems to have gone out of its way to give the stiff arm to these victims. They have made their lives miserable," said attorney Neal Shur, who is the lead counsel in the case.

The lead plaintiff is Shawn Manning, who was an Army staff sergeant three years ago and was shot six times.

"The Army has refused to acknowledge this was a terrorist attack, and I have exhausted all other options," he said.

The other defendants include Hasan, who was shot by police during the attack and paralyzed from the chest down, and the estate of Anwar al-Awlaki, a U.S.-born cleric linked to al Qaeda's Yemen-based wing. He was killed in a U.S. drone strike last year.

An independent review headed by former FBI Director William Webster found that Hasan had exchanged emails with Awlaki.

The lawsuit includes allegations of civil conspiracy, gross negligence, assault and battery, due process violations and intentional misrepresentations.

Shur said one reason the suit was filed was that federal authorities had "ignored" $750 million in administrative claims he sought in 2011.

(Reporting by Ian Simpson; editing by Christopher Wilson)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (38)
TheMule wrote:
The Obamaites call Tea Party people terrorists, but the Fort Hood shooting is officially labeled “workplace violence”… from a man who was scream “Allah Akbar” while he shot his victims. Because of the Obama administration’s refusal to acknowledge the obvious terrorism of the Fort Hood shooting, the victims get lesser benefits.

Obama is an evil president with an evil administration and they are working hand in hand with the enemies of most people living in the US.

Nov 06, 2012 9:11am EST  --  Report as abuse
AmericanJoe wrote:
They should sue Obama he has been protecting his Islamic brother, why has he not been brought up for trial? The Sargent from Wash state has and every other american serviceman has been prosecuted why is Obama protecting him? Just because they are both MUSLIMS.

Nov 06, 2012 9:30am EST  --  Report as abuse
JayHackett wrote:
I support the Fort Hood victims. They should be allowed their day in court. The people of Arizona should also be allowed to Counter Sue the Obama Justice department for harassment. The people of Arizona and all border states HAVE THE RIGHT to secure their borders against illegal encroachment (drug cartels).

Nov 06, 2012 9:41am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Pictures