Read
- Planetary alignment peaks with celestial show this weekend
- UK fighters escort Pakistan plane to airport, two arrests
- Sixth night of violence in Sweden, but police say capital calmer
|
- Judge rules against 'America's toughest sheriff' in racial profiling lawsuit
- Justice Department defends journalist email search
Sponsored Links
TEXT-S&P rates Athabasca Oil 'CCC+'
Overview
-- We are assigning our 'CCC+' long-term corporate credit rating to
Athabasca Oil Corp. (AOC).
-- We are also assigning our 'B' issue-level rating to the company's
proposed senior secured second-lien bonds, with a '1' recovery rating.
-- The rating reflects our view of the company's regionally focused
upstream operations, its small (albeit growing) production base, the
associated weak forecasted cash flow generation, and inability to internally
fund its stated conventional and oil sands growth objectives.
-- The developing outlook reflects our view that, based on AOC's
prospective competitive position, there is almost an equal likelihood of its
credit profile strengthening or deteriorating during our forecast period.
Rating Action
On Nov. 7, 2012, Standard & Poor's Ratings Services assigned its 'CCC+'
long-term corporate credit rating to Calgary, Alta.-based upstream producer
Athabasca Oil Corp. (AOC). The outlook is developing. At the same time,
Standard & Poor's assigned its 'B' issue-level rating to The company's
proposed senior secured second-lien bonds, with a '1' recovery rating,
indicating an expectation of very high (90%-100%) recovery for debtholders in
a default scenario.
Rationale
The rating on AOC reflects Standard & Poor's view of the company's regionally
focused upstream operations, its small (albeit growing) production base, the
associated weak forecasted cash flow generation, and inability to internally
fund its stated conventional and oil sands growth objectives. We believe that
offsetting these weaknesses somewhat are AOC's ability to sell portions of its
vast undeveloped acreage and its liquidity position, which we believe is
enhanced by both its proposed C$600 million senior secured bond issue; and the
company's ability to sell its 40% interest in the Dover property through its
put-call agreement with its joint venture partner, Phoenix Energy Holdings
Ltd. (previously, Cretaceous Oilsands Holdings Ltd.; a wholly owned subsidiary
of PetroChina International Investment Co. Ltd.).
AOC focuses on the development of conventional oil and gas and in-situ
bitumen. It operates two business segments: the light oil division and thermal
oil division. AOC's conventional oil and gas operations are concentrated in
northwest Alberta, and its bitumen resources are in Dover, Dover West,
Hangingstone, Birch, and Grosmont (all in the Athabasca oil sands fairway).
In our opinion, the company's vulnerable business risk profile reflects its
regionally focused upstream operations and low forecast production, which we
do not expect to generate sufficient operating cash flow to support growth
objectives during our 2012-2013 forecast period and beyond. Due to the limited
scope of its operations and low levels of cash flow generation, we believe AOC
would be unable to adjust its operating strategy to offset normally occurring
industry events, such as hydrocarbon price volatility, unanticipated
operational issues, or material capital cost overruns. Although we believe the
company should be able to continue increasing its conventional oil and gas
production in the near and medium term, in our opinion, its relatively small
reserves (which includes its total proven reserves and probable oil sands
reserves) and production base will continue to hamper AOC's competitive
position. In addition, the company's reserves base incorporated in our
assessment of its competitive position includes a much higher component of
probable oil sands related reserves than other companies in Standard & Poor's
Canadian oil and gas ratings universe. In our view, the high proportion of
probable reserves in the reserves base we incorporate in our assessment of the
company's business risk profile heightens its operational risk exposure.
Although these factors limit the prospective business risk profile, we believe
the organic growth prospects inherent in AOC's 4.3 million net acres of
undeveloped land, as well as its projected conventional oil and gas production
growth could likely support a 'B-' rating beyond the near term. The company
has amassed a considerable land position, including both conventional and
unconventional resources, which we believe provide an internal growth profile
reflective of a stronger rating than the current 'CCC+'. In our view, the
company should be able to continue ramping up its conventional oil and gas
production beyond its forecast 10,000-11,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day
expected production exit rate at year-end 2012. Nevertheless, Standard &
Poor's believes the company's production levels will not generate sufficient
cash flow to support its organic growth objectives for several years.
Despite the low levels of expected cash flow generation, we believe AOC's
conventional oil and gas operations are in areas with a competitive cost
profile, so it should be able to generate positive netbacks in a midcycle
hydrocarbon price environment if the company's full-cycle costs remain
consistent with regional averages.
In our opinion, AOC's highly leveraged financial risk profile reflects our
forecasted negative free cash flow generation, as our estimates of the
company's funds from operations (FFO) will remain insufficient to support its
growth objectives during our forecast period and beyond. Based on Standard &
Poor's hydrocarbon price, heavy oil price differential, inflation and
exchange rate assumptions for 2012-2014, we expect AOC's capital expenditures,
as it continues to increase its conventional oil and gas operations, and
begins developing its in-situ resources, will significantly outpace our FFO
estimates well beyond our forecast period. Although we believe AOC's fully
adjusted pro forma debt-to-EBITDA following the proposed C$600 million debt
issue will remain above 9.0x at year-end 2012, cash flow protection metrics
should improve materially by year-end 2013, as increasing production and cash
flow generation should offset the company's relatively low balance sheet
leverage.
Liquidity
In our view, AOC's liquidity will be adequate to support its expected spending
in 2012 and 2013. Our assessment of the company's liquidity position assumes
both its proposed C$600 million bond issue and sale of its 40% ownership
interest in the Dover oil sands project occurs during our liquidity assessment
period. Without these transactions, liquidity would be significantly weaker,
given the large disparity between forecast FFO and anticipated capital
expenditures.
Recovery analysis
For the complete recovery analysis, see the recovery report to be published on
RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal following this research report.
Outlook
The developing outlook reflects Standard & Poor's view that, based on the
company's prospective competitive position, there is almost an equal
likelihood of its credit profile strengthening or deteriorating during our
forecast period.
If AOC's production and cash flow profile strengthen in the future, we believe
the company's business and financial risk profiles could support a 'B-'rating,
assuming debt remains relatively stable. The company's cash flow protection
metrics should strengthen materially as cash flows continue increasing
relative to fairly stable debt levels. We believe AOC should be able to
continue increasing its conventional oil and gas production as it ramps up the
development of the assets in its light oil division. Although forecast FFO
will likely remain well below our estimated near- and medium-term capital
expenditures for the company, cash flow protection metrics should strengthen
by year-end 2013 and beyond. Under our assumptions, we believe AOC's fully
adjusted debt-to-EBITDA could trend below 6.5x by year-end 2013. If the
company is able to continue improving its cash flow protection metrics, as it
increases its oil and gas production, we would raise the rating to 'B-'.
Conversely, we believe the company's credit profile is also vulnerable to
near-term deterioration, because the small scale of its operations limits its
ability to absorb unexpected adverse events, which we believe could occur due
to the oil and gas industry's inherent volatility. Furthermore, AOC's
prospective liquidity relies heavily on anticipated asset sales and its
proposed debt issuance, so we believe the company will have limited ability to
fund material cost overruns if capital expenditures increase above the levels
expected from 2012-2014. As a result, if the company's liquidity position were
to weaken materially, such that it would not be able to increase or sustain
its operations, we would lower the rating.
Related Criteria And Research
-- Key Credit Factors: Global Criteria For Rating The Oil And Gas
Exploration And Production Industry, Jan. 20, 2012
-- Methodology And Assumptions: Liquidity Descriptors For Global
Corporate Issuers, Sept. 28, 2011
-- Canadian Oil Sands Projects: How We Rate Them, And Why, March 17, 2011
Ratings List
Ratings Assigned
Athabasca Oil Corp.
Corporate credit rating CCC+/Developing/--
Proposed senior secured bonds B
Recovery rating 1
Complete ratings information is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect on
the Global Credit Portal at www.globalcreditportal.com. All ratings affected
by this rating action can be found on Standard & Poor's public Web site at
www.standardandpoors.com. Use the Ratings search box located in the left
column.
- Tweet this
- Link this
- Share this
- Digg this
- Reprints
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.


Follow Reuters