TEXT - Fitch rates Clark County, PUD Wash.

Thu Nov 8, 2012 2:27pm EST

Related Topics

Nov 8 - Fitch Ratings assigns an 'A+' rating to the following Clark County
Public Utility District No. 1 (the district or Clark Public Utilities) revenue
bonds: 

--$53.63 million electric system revenue and refunding bonds, series 2012;
--$37.47 million generating system revenue and refunding bonds, series 2012A;
--$15.28 million generating system revenue bonds, series 2012B (taxable)

The 2012 bonds are scheduled to price Nov. 15, 2012, via negotiation.  Electric 
system proceeds will fund a portion of capital expenditures, cash fund the debt 
service reserve requirement, and economically refund certain outstanding parity 
bonds (portions of series 2002A, 2003 and 2005). 

The generation system proceeds will finance capital improvements, repay an 
outstanding draw on a bank line of credit (used to fund generation system 
capital expenditures), refund the remaining series 2000 parity generation system
bonds, and cash fund the debt service reserve account to its required amount 
(replacing existing surety bonds).   

In addition, Fitch affirms the following ratings: 

--$226.4 million electric system revenue and refunding bonds; 

--$179.3 million generation system revenue and refunding bonds.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.

SECURITY 

The electric system bonds are secured by a pledge of the net revenues of the 
district's electric system; the generation system bonds are secured by the net 
revenues of the generation system. 

It is important to note that the operating expenses of the electric system 
include 'contract resource obligations'. These obligations encompass all the 
costs of the generation system (including debt service), which is payable as an 
operating expense of the electric system and ahead of the electric system's own 
debt service. 

The electric system is required to meet the contract resource obligations 
whether or not the generating system plant is operable. 

KEY RATING DRIVERS

STABLE, SEPARATE UTILITY SYSTEMS: Clark Public Utilities maintains three 
separately financed utility systems: retail electric distribution (184,488 
customers); generation (district is sole offtaker); and water (30,000). The 'A+'
rating reflects the stable financial position of the utility systems, solid 
plant operating performance and diverse customer base.    

SOUND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: The district's financial coverage metrics at both 
the electric distribution (1.5x debt service coverage) and generation system 
(1.14x) strengthened in 2011 due to modest energy sales growth and consecutive 
annual rate increases since 2009. Financial coverage for 2012 is poised to 
surpass 2011 with better than average regional water conditions contributing to 
greater surplus power sales for the district. 

REBUILDING LIQUIDITY: The district's management team has made a concerted effort
to rebuild liquidity, which had fallen in recent years due to recession induced 
lower energy sales. In 2011, liquidity rose to 46 days operating cash from 11 
days in the prior year. The rate stabilization fund balance, in particular, was 
boosted by $20 million in 2011 (to $22.7 million) reflecting improved margins 
and cash flow at the district. 

RELIABLE PURCHASED POWER MIX: The district's 2011 purchased power resource mix 
is adequately diverse, reliable and competitive: 58% Bonneville Power 
Administration hydropower; 37% River Road natural gas plant (generating system);
and wind/market purchases accounting for the rest. The district does not need 
new baseload generation until post-2020. 

DIVERSE CUSTOMER BASE: The district benefits from a heavily residential customer
and revenue base (totaling 60% of 2011 operating revenues). Residential users 
are typically the most stable utility customer class. Industrial concentration 
is not a concern as all industrial users represent just 12.6% of operating 
revenues and the largest single user accounts for a modest 4.6% of revenues. 

COMPETITIVE RETAIL RATES: The district's average retail rates are above some of 
the other public utility districts that own hydroelectric generation in the 
state; however, rates compare favorably (20%-30% lower) to similar sized 
municipal and investor-owned utilities in the area.

WHAT COULD TRIGGER A RATING ACTION 

FAILURE TO BALANCE MARGINS AND LIQUIDITY: The district's failure to maintain 
adequate liquidity and financial coverage measures, given narrow financial 
margins and more variable BPA power purchases, would be viewed negatively. 

CREDIT PROFILE

The district's management team has an established history of fiscal conservatism
coupled with close fiscal oversight, which results in consistent and stable 
financial metrics, albeit at a lower level compared to their rating category 
peers. Company projections, by design, incorporate tight financial protection 
measures, with electric system debt service coverage targeted in the 1.30x 
range. Fitch believes this relatively low debt service coverage is somewhat 
offset by the district's very conservative assumptions, willingness to raise 
rates to maintain financial position, and frequently stronger actual operating 
results than originally budgeted. 

Liquidity levels for the district (at 46 days operating cash) remain low for the
rating category ('A+' retail systems' median is 134 days), but have improved. 
The district is focused on strengthening cash reserves, in particular, the rate 
stabilization fund. For 2012, the district is expecting to transfer another $8 
million from the revenue fund to the rate stabilization fund, bringing the 
balance to $30.7 million and adding roughly 10 more days operating cash. 

In addition, both the electric system and the generation system maintain 
separate $20 million lines of credit with US Bank N.A., which expire Dec. 31, 
2014. With this external liquidity source, the district's liquidity rises to 70 
days as of Dec. 31, 2011.   

Prospectively, the district's 5-year financial projections are based upon 
conservative assumptions including: below-average northwest water conditions, 
modest sales growth (0.25% per year), minimal retail rate adjustments, 
considerable BPA wholesale rate increases, and manageable capital expenditures. 
Fitch will be looking for the district's financial performance and liquidity 
levels to strengthen in 2012 and remain adequate for the rating category through
the forecast period.
FILED UNDER:
Comments (0)
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.