UPDATE 1-U.S. Supreme Court to review Amex arbitration case
* Court to review mandatory arbitration clause
* Merchants say should be able to sue as a class
By Terry Baynes and Jonathan Stempel
Nov 9 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday agreed to consider whether American Express Co may invoke an arbitration clause to prevent merchant customers from banding together in an antitrust lawsuit against the company.
The court accepted the credit card and travel services company's appeal from a February ruling by the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York th at vo ided the clause, and allowed merchants including the Italian Colors Restaurant in Oakland, California to pursue a class-action lawsuit.
A decision could determine the extent to which companies might rely on arbitration clauses to fend off class-action lawsuits, which can allow litigants to obtain larger recoveries at lower cost.
Since 1999, American Express has required merchant customers to w aive thei r right to sue the company in a class action.
But a group of restaurants, retailers and other customers sued in 2003, saying the New York-based company violated antitrust law in its effort to force them to pay in flated fees on ch arge card transactions.
A two-judge panel of the 2nd Circuit said the company's mandatory arbitration clause violated antitrust law, because many merchants would find it economically unfeasible to pu rsue their claims individually.
American Express said that ruling created a "sweeping, unwritten loophole" in federal arbitration law that should be overturned.
The Supreme Court has in recent years shown deference to arbitration clauses, while narrowing the ability of various plaintiffs to bring class-action lawsuits.
In a 2011 case involving AT&T Inc, the court gave businesses a big victory by upholding contracts that required customers to submit to individual arbitrations to resolve disputes, and waive their right to pursue class-action litigation. A California law had prohibited such waivers.
The same year, the court decertified a class of as many as 1.5 million female workers at Wal-Mart Stores Inc who alleged gender bias in pay and promotions.
The Supreme Court will likely hear oral arguments in the American Express case early next year, with a decision to follow by the end of June.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who was involved with the case when she was a federal appeals court judge, did not take part in the decision to accept American Express' appeal.
The case is American Express Co et al v. Italian Colors Restaurant et al, U.S. Supreme Court, No. 12-133.
- Exclusive: Malaysia plane probe narrows on mid-air disintegration - source
- Radar showed missing plane may have turned back: Malaysia military
- Missing Malaysian jet may have disintegrated in mid-air: source |
- Malaysian plane presumed crashed; questions over false IDs |
- Merkel raps Putin as Russian forces tighten grip on Crimea |