Apple and HTC settle global patent battle

Sat Nov 10, 2012 10:01pm EST

1 of 2. The Apple logo hangs in a glass enclosure above the 5th Ave Apple Store in New York, September 20, 2012. Apple's iPhone 5 goes on sale tomorrow.

Credit: Reuters/Lucas Jackson

Related Topics

(Reuters) - Apple Inc and HTC Corp announced on Saturday a global patent settlement and 10-year licensing agreement that ends one of the first major conflagrations of the smartphone patent wars.

Apple sued HTC in 2010, accusing the Taiwanese handset company of infringing on the iPhone maker's patented technology. It was Apple's first major legal salvo against a manufacturer that used Google's Android operating system.

Apple and HTC did not disclose specific terms of the deal. In a joint statement, Apple chief executive Tim Cook said he was glad to reach a settlement.

"We will continue to stay laser focused on product innovation," Cook said. HTC chief executive Peter Chou said his company was pleased to resolve the dispute so it could "focus on innovation instead of litigation."

Since Apple first sued HTC, its smartphone patent war has engulfed competitors like Samsung Electronics Co Ltd and Google's Motorola Mobility unit.

The iPhone maker won a $1.05 billion verdict against Samsung in August, while litigation against Motorola has failed to produce any decisive wins.

However, Apple had the most success against HTC when it came to using litigation to actually disrupt the flow of products into the crucial U.S. market.

Late last year, the U.S. International Trade Commission ruled that HTC had infringed upon one of four patents Apple had disputed and imposed a sales ban on some of the Taiwanese maker's phones.

Though HTC said it had devised a technical workaround to Apple's patents, the company announced in May that shipments of its phones were being held up by U.S. customs officials.

Once one of the industry's high flyers, HTC has been badly hit by competition from Apple and Samsung. Last month HTC forecast a 14.5 percent fall in revenue in the fourth quarter from the third, worse than analyst forecasts and the second straight quarterly decline this year.

(Reporting By Dan Levine; Editing by Peter Cooney and Todd Eastham)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
grenyx wrote:
“We will continue to stay laser focused on product innovation,” Cook said. HTC chief executive Peter Chou said his company was pleased to resolve the dispute so it could “focus on innovation instead of litigation.”

Yeah…right…

Nov 11, 2012 3:44am EST  --  Report as abuse
Neurochuck wrote:
Is this really global, or more quasi-protectionism of the USA market?
Apple is not winning on many points in Europe or Asia, or not even contesting legally.
Google of “global smartphone market” found eg:
“30 percent of the world’s mobile users live in India and China. As of March 2012, there are now more than a billion subscribers in China, with India not far behind. Both dwarf the number of subscribers in third place USA.” mobile subscribers – potential smartphones. Lots of other stats at this link:
http://mobithinking.com/mobile-marketing-tools/latest-mobile-stats/a#topmobilemarkets
Personally just bought a good performance Lenovo (China) laptop with latest fast Intel chips cheaper than an Apple iPad in the Australia (Global) market. Replaced a Dell – US brands not competitive, and made in China anyway, plus lots of overhead for lawyers, overpaid suits, marketeers, investment banks, …

Nov 11, 2012 8:15am EST  --  Report as abuse
All these suits will reduce innovation, not increase it.

Nov 11, 2012 10:03am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.