Ex-BBC boss set to take reins at New York Times

Mon Nov 12, 2012 2:43am EST

Mark Thompson poses for media on a visit to Media City the company's new northern headquarters in Salford, northern England in this May 10, 2011 file photograph. REUTERS/Nigel Roddis/Files

Mark Thompson poses for media on a visit to Media City the company's new northern headquarters in Salford, northern England in this May 10, 2011 file photograph.

Credit: Reuters/Nigel Roddis/Files

(Reuters) - The New York Times Co said it will proceed with its plan for Mark Thompson to take over as CEO on Monday, despite an intensifying scandal at the BBC that has raised questions about his tenure at Britain's flagship broadcasting company.

"He is going to be CEO beginning November 12," a New York Times spokesman said on Sunday.

The New York Times maintained its confidence in the paper's new chief following the news that George Entwistle, the director-general of the BBC, said he was resigning from the broadcaster on Saturday. Entwistle took the blame for a news program at its flagship Newsnight, which aired a mistaken allegation that a former British senior politician sexually abused children.

The latest embarrassment comes as the BBC faces police and other investigations into claims that hundreds of people, some as young as 12, were sexually abused over the course of decades by one of their top personalities, the late Jimmy Savile. It is also facing awkward questions over how the same Newsnight program - while Thompson was director-general - killed a report that was investigating complaints against Savile and instead aired laudatory shows commemorating Savile after he died last year.

Thompson said he did not know about the nature of the investigation by Newsnight into Savile, and had no involvement in the decision to axe the report.

He later said he had a "chance meeting" with a journalist who mentioned the Newsnight investigation into Savile, but said he had not been told any of the details or the scale of the problem.

Entwistle's departure and his acceptance of responsibility for editorial decisions as director -general, adds pressure to any evaluation of Thompson's role at the BBC and whether he was ultimately accountable for the shelving of the Savile report.

Thompson did not immediately respond to a request for comment regarding Entwistle's resignation. Earlier, he declined to be interviewed about his plans for the New York Times.

(Reporting By Jennifer Saba)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
GraceOM wrote:
One takes the “reins” as if managing a horse. Queen Elizabeth reigns.

Nov 12, 2012 2:17am EST  --  Report as abuse
Verpoly wrote:
Did Chris Patten authorize this million dollars golden handshake payment to a guy serving for less than 2 months in poor leadership? No wonder his mindset as then-governor was to spend all reserves before Hongkong was turned over to China. Sympathy on U.K. taxpayers.

Nov 12, 2012 2:49am EST  --  Report as abuse
aeci wrote:
The ‘I knew nothing defense’ doesn’t cut it Mark. Very strange to use a Nixonian argument at such a Liberal bastion as the NYT. The Times is dead wrong on this. And, should give itself a review as to why this man should be defended as a proper choice.

Nov 12, 2012 8:26am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.