Democrat gaining as Arizona Senate race vote count drags on

PHOENIX Mon Nov 12, 2012 9:40pm EST

Related Topics

PHOENIX (Reuters) - With several hundred thousand ballots still to be counted in the race for an Arizona Senate seat, a Democrat who earlier conceded the race to his Republican rival was gaining and appeared to have a distant shot at the seat after all.

Former U.S. Surgeon General Richard Carmona conceded on election night last Tuesday to six-term U.S. Congressman Jeff Flake after about three quarters of precincts had reported, showing Flake with a lead of about six percentage points.

But nearly a week later, with more than 340,000 ballots yet to be counted, the tally has tightened to about four points, leaving the Carmona campaign watching closely to ensure that each and every ballot is counted.

The most recent results show Flake in the lead by 79,547 votes in a race in which 2 million ballots were cast.

"We're monitoring it closely, and we want every ballot to get counted, and we will take any necessary steps to make sure that happens," said Carmona campaign spokesman Andy Barr.

It is very unlikely the outstanding ballots could overturn the result of the race in Arizona, which has not returned a Democratic Senator since Dennis DeConcini won office in 1988.

But Barr said the campaign, which is now down about 4 percentage points, expected to gain ground as the tally continues over coming days.

"The count is going very, very slowly, and it is hard for us to know where it will end up," he told Reuters.

As of Monday afternoon, the Secretary of State's office reported that an estimated 171,889 early votes and 171,047 provisional ballots had yet to be tallied statewide.

The Democrat's candidacy was boosted in part by a drive to register throngs of Hispanics riled by the state's two-year-old crackdown on illegal immigration. Such a large uncounted vote has prompted an outcry from some Hispanic and civil rights activists about the fairness of the voting process.

Activists have especially questioned the large number of provisional ballots, wondering whether minorities were singled out to cast these ballots at the polls.

Under Arizona law, voters generally are required to cast provisional ballots at polling places if they lack proper identification, if their name is not on the poll roster or if they requested an early ballot.

Matt Roberts, a spokesman for the secretary of state's office, said he did not believe there were widespread problems at the polls, and that counties tabulating the votes were doing their best to make sure every ballot was counted.

"We're focused on accuracy, rather than expediency," he said. "We're cognizant that we need to get this done quickly, but we're not going to cut corners."

County election officials have until the end of the week to finish, but Roberts said counting can continue past the deadline if needed. A state canvass to certify the election results is set for December 3.

(Editing by Cynthia Johnston and Todd Eastham)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (8)
fromthecenter wrote:
What is it with the senior states and counting ballots anyway. First florida and now arizona.

Nov 12, 2012 10:16pm EST  --  Report as abuse
julianzr wrote:
When a party has to systematically suppress votes to survive, there is a major problem with its ideology, the ideology of greed and narcissism that made Romney absurdly out of touch with enduring American familiality.

Nov 12, 2012 10:36pm EST  --  Report as abuse
AaronRamirez wrote:
And let’s not forget Arpaio’s vote count, which is ignoring several thousand ballots that could possibly kick the Sheriff out.

Nov 12, 2012 10:39pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.