Tax credit for wind farms blown into "fiscal cliff" debate

WASHINGTON Tue Nov 13, 2012 3:45pm EST

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Iowa Republican Senator Charles Grassley said he is hopeful Congress will renew a tax credit for wind energy but acknowledged that its fate depends on sweeping negotiations over tax and spending issues in coming weeks.

Grassley, instigator of a 22-year-old production tax credit that has driven expansion of wind farms and related manufacturers, made his comments as governors from wind-producing states and companies involved in the industry pushed to keep the subsidy alive.

"As important as I think wind energy is, we've got a big fiscal problem here," Grassley told reporters on Wednesday, explaining the issue is but a small part of talks over the impending "fiscal cliff" between President Barack Obama, House Republican Speaker John Boehner, and others.

Obama campaigned in support of renewing the tax credit. Many Republicans are opposed to supports for the renewable energy sector, including wind.

Supports for all modes of energy production are in play as Congress looks for ways to address the nation's looming debt.

Republican Senator Lamar Alexander from Tennessee said the country can no longer afford the energy credits.

"Given our fiscal crisis, Congress should eliminate special tax breaks for both Big Oil and Big Wind," Alexander wrote in a column in Roll Call.

FOR NOW, NOT FOREVER

In August, the Senate Finance Committee agreed to extend the credit for wind projects under construction by the end of 2013, a measure estimated to cost more than $12 billion over 10 years.

Some Republicans support the credit because of the jobs it supports at power plants and factories that make parts.

U.S. wind farms installed a record number of turbines in 2012 but uncertainty about the tax credit has prompted layoffs at manufacturers like Vestas in Colorado, Siemens in Iowa and Gamesa in Pennsylvania.

"We know that this is not going to be something that is going to last forever," said Iowa's Governor Terry Branstad, a Republican who said the industry, which employs about 75,000 people, needs a few years to "transition" away from the support.

A lobbying group for the wind industry has said 37,000 jobs would be lost in the first quarter of 2013 unless the tax credit is extended.

Tax credits for energy and other industries will continue to be in focus as lawmakers look at overhauling the tax code, starting next year. Grassley said the wind credit should not be targeted outside a broader tax reform discussion.

"No single energy tax incentive should be singled out over others before a broad-based tax reform debate takes place," he told reporters.

Oil and gas companies have several tax provisions - such as the well depletion allowance and expensing of intangible drilling costs - that Obama and some Democrats would like to eliminate.

Even some Republicans, including Boehner, have put cutting fossil fuel breaks on the table for possible elimination.

The American Petroleum Institute, the industry's main lobby group, said it will start advertising within days to protect the industry's tax breaks on grounds that cutting them will cost jobs. The group will focus on Alaska, Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Colorado, North Carolina and Virginia. Each of those states has a Democratic senator up for re-election in 2014.

(Additional reporting by Kim Dixon; editing by Andrew Hay)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
Wiegand wrote:
Since jobs are one of the primary selling points of the wind industry, just think of how many more jobs would be created with the production of bird safe wind turbines. Turbines not linked to Boeing technology.
Across the world people are finally waking up to the decades of deceit and the horrific impacts caused by the wind industry.

All this would have happened much sooner if conservation groups like the Sierra Club did not sell-out their causes. As it is, these groups end up in the mitigation process and get paid off for ridiculous solutions that do not work. So in the end these hypocrites get loads of money while claiming to protect the environment and the millions of birds being killed from wind turbines.

Today, thanks to wind industry mitigation, we now have California condors that will forever be trapped in small regions near their feeding stations and the highly endangered whooping crane population is rapidly declining. Sadly this migrating population is on its last legs because they will not be able to coexist with the thousands of wind turbines being built along their migration route. . For decades prior to 2006 or before the wind industry invasion, whooping crane numbers had increased about 4 percent per year. But since 2006 the average mortality for this period has been about 41 cranes or close to 20 percent per year. Most importantly has been NO NET GAIN in numbers for this highly endangered species.

The propeller style wind turbine is also a prolific killer of eagles. The impact caused by decades of killing these raptors at wind farms can now be seen in an 80-90 percent population decline for the golden eagle in Southern CA. Thousands of miles surveyed only found 1 occupied nest and 45 empty nests. True to form, the industry will create bogus studies and blame drought, climate change, or lead poisoning to cover their butts.

But not a negative word can be heard from any of these groups except the American Bird Conservancy. All this seems incredible since wind farms are a nothing but death traps to birds, much like the La Brea Tar Pits were to prehistoric animals.

Nov 14, 2012 11:31am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Full focus