A handout photograph distributed by Syria's national news agency SANA on May 22,2013, show detained men, blindfolded and handcuffed, described by SANA as "terrorists fighters", a term commonly used to describe rebels fighting to topple President Bashar al-Assad, in Qusair, near Homs.    SANA/Handout via Reuters

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more 

Photo

Devastated by Tornado

A huge tornado tears through an Oklahoma City suburb.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Senator-elect Angus King sides with Democrats

Related Topics

Former Maine Governor Angus King is pictured in this undated photograph released on June 22, 2012. REUTERS/Courtesy of the Office of Angus King/Handout

Former Maine Governor Angus King is pictured in this undated photograph released on June 22, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Courtesy of the Office of Angus King/Handout

WASHINGTON | Wed Nov 14, 2012 10:23am EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Senator-elect Angus King, an independent and former Maine governor, said Wednesday he will caucus with President Barack Obama's Democrats, raising the party's control of the Senate to 55-45 in the new Congress that convenes in January.

King had been expected to side with Democrats, but deferred his decision until after the general election last week. His allegiance gives Democrats a gain of two seats in the 100-member chamber but falls short of the 60 votes necessary to block the filibusters that frequently paralyze the Senate.

King will fill the seat of Republican Senator Olympia Snowe, who retired with a denunciation of the partisan gridlock that prevents Congress from resolving many of the nation's problems.

As a former governor who worked with both Democrats and Republicans in his state, King said he believed that he could help obtain bipartisan solutions in Washington.

"By associating myself with one side I am not in automatic opposition to the other," said King, who while governor of Maine had weekly luncheons with state Democratic and Republican leaders.

"I hope in a small way, in a small way, I may be able to act as a bridge between the parties, an honest broker," King said.

King is considered conservative on fiscal issues and liberal on social matters.

"By associating myself with one side I am not in automatic opposition to the other," he said.

"I hope in a small way, in a small way, I may be able to act as a bridge between the parties, an honest broker."

As for reducing the record U.S. debt, King wrote in a campaign position paper, "all options must be on the table."

He expressed interest in ideas proposed by a commission headed by former Republican Senator Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles, a chief of staff to Democratic President Bill Clinton.

In 2010, the Simpson-Bowles panel called for a mix of spending cuts and tax increases to trim the debt by $4 trillion over a decade.

Obama declined to embrace the plan and it ran aground, although the concept is gaining new life at least as a talking point as Congress faces a "fiscal cliff" of expiring tax cuts and mandatory reductions in spending that could slam the economy when it takes effect in January.

In 2010, the Simpson-Bowles panel called for a mix of spending cuts and tax increases to trim the debt by $4 trillion over a decade.

(Reporting By Thomas Ferraro; Editing by Doina Chiacu)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (1)
triumph900 wrote:
Democrats beginning with Senator Patty Murray are lining up behind the idea of allowing us to go over the “fiscal cliff.” Their reasoning is that both parties get what they want from that action; democrats get military cuts and tax increases, republicans get cuts to social spending. Both sides also know that after the cuts take place both sides will start putting the spending back in place ASAP. So it’s a win for both parties…and a loss for the people who put them into office.

I’m for the automatic cuts too. After the healthcare bill was passed democrats lost big in the next election.

Nov 15, 2012 9:05am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.