Two killed in suicide bomb attack near Kabul NATO base

KABUL Wed Nov 21, 2012 7:27am EST

1 of 4. NATO troops inspect the site of a suicide bomb attack in Kabul November 21, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Omar Sobhani

Related Topics

KABUL (Reuters) - A suicide bomber killed two Afghan guards outside a NATO-run compound in the main diplomatic area of the Afghan capital, Kabul, on Wednesday, Interior Ministry officials said, an attack that was quickly claimed by the Taliban.

"The bomber killed himself in front of the compound. Two people were killed and two more were wounded, all Afghan guards," said Interior Ministry spokesman Najib Danesh.

A second man wearing an explosives-laden vest also approached the front of the compound but was shot dead by Afghan security forces, a statement from the Kabul police chief said. It said five civilians were also wounded.

The bomber struck near the sprawling base known as Camp Eggers, the headquarters of the NATO training mission and home to some 2,500 trainers from the multinational coalition.

Dozens of police swarmed to the area, where shattered glass from cars lay on the ground, and cordoned it off.

The Taliban took responsibility for the attack, which happened at 8.20 a.m. (0350 GMT) local time, Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid told Reuters by telephone from an undisclosed location.

Violence is intensifying across Afghanistan ahead of the planned withdrawal of most foreign troops by the end of 2014, sparking concerns over how the 350,000-strong Afghan security forces will be able to manage.

At least a dozen embassies, including the U.S. and British missions, and the headquarters of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) are all near the area of the attack.

(Additional reporting by Martin Petty, writing by Amie Ferris-Rotman,; Editing by Paul Tait)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (1)
americanguy wrote:
Based on the decline in attacks, and the handling of security by Afghans (which is better than it was under NATO) someone explain to me why we are still there, and why we need to “train” the Afghans.
There is no explanation, that is why the question is never really asked and there is never an answer as to why we are still in Afghanistan. Romney “we will stay in Afghanistan” Obama “we still stay in Afghanistan” and nobody pushed them as to why. Now we learn troops will remain after 2014 to “help train the Afghans”. What is going on?
I suspect they have found a lot of oil there.

Nov 21, 2012 7:22am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.