Boehner comments show tough road ahead for "fiscal cliff" talks

WASHINGTON Thu Nov 22, 2012 5:22pm EST

Speaker of the House John Boehner speaks to the press after a bipartisan meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama to discuss the economy in the Roosevelt Room of the White House November 16, 2012. REUTERS/Larry Downing

Speaker of the House John Boehner speaks to the press after a bipartisan meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama to discuss the economy in the Roosevelt Room of the White House November 16, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Larry Downing

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - New comments from top Republican lawmaker John Boehner slamming health care reforms illustrate how hard it will be for Washington to reach a deficit reduction deal when talks resume next week, analysts said on Thursday.

President Barack Obama and the U.S. Congress will begin negotiating next week on a plan that could avert tax hikes and spending cuts set to begin in January that economists worry could push the U.S. economy over the "fiscal cliff" and into recession.

Boehner did not explicitly mention the "fiscal cliff" talks in an opinion piece published in the Cincinnati Enquirer on Wednesday. But he argued the nation cannot afford the costs of Obama's 2010 health care reform law, given the United State's sluggish economy and massive $16 trillion debt.

"That's why I've been clear that the law has to stay on the table as both parties discuss ways to solve our nation's massive debt challenge," said Boehner, who is a key player in the talks.

Boehner's comments show it won't be easy to reach a deal on the thorny tax and spending issues, said Greg Valliere, chief political strategist at Potomac Research Group in Washington.

"There's an enormous gulf between the two parties on the details," he said, noting it is still possible that Obama and Congress may agree by January to broad spending and tax measures, and then take months afterwards to iron out details.

"Plunging off the cliff, then passing a tax cut in January that excludes the rich -- is still a very live option," Valliere said.


Analysts said Boehner's renewed critique of the health care law is designed to appeal to Republicans in the House of Representatives who have voted more than 30 times to repeal it.

The law aims to extend health coverage to more than 30 million uninsured Americans starting in 2014. It also contains measures designed to contain the costs of America's $2.6 trillion healthcare system, the most expensive in the world.

Republicans had promised to repeal the law, which they call "Obamacare", if they won the November presidential elections.

But Obama won, and Democrats kept their majority in the Senate. Last June, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the reforms.

Boehner's comments were "not constructive" for the fiscal talks ahead because there is little chance negotiations will lead to changes in the health care law, said Jim Kessler, senior vice president for policy at centrist think-tank Third Way.

"This is a complete non-starter and a clumsy starting point for negotiations," Kessler said.

Larry Sabato, political scientist at the University of Virginia, said he thought Boehner's comments seemed like a "bargaining chip" for the talks ahead.

"Just as President Obama is insisting that taxes must go up for everyone making $250,000 or more, the Republicans are saying that Obamacare is on the table," he said, noting he expects the income trigger for tax increases will end up being much higher and that the healthcare law will stay untouched.

After the election, Boehner acknowledged in an ABC News interview that "Obamacare is the law of the land", although he also said the law had to be "on the table" as legislators work toward balancing the nation's budget.

Julie Barnes, director of healthcare policy at the Bipartisan Policy Center, said the costs associated with getting the new health reforms in place pale in comparison to the much-larger costs of tax and spending issues before lawmakers.

"Small businesses and large businesses are not going to view Obamacare as what's really causing the problem for their competitiveness. The problem is health care costs," Barnes said.

(Additional reporting by Rachelle Younglai and Richard Cowan; editing by Andrew Hay)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (27)
bobber1956 wrote:
In January the Republicans will have even a tighter grip on the House Of Representatives with Paul Ryan is the Cairman of House Budget Committee, did someone forget that? Side stepping those that really care about the economy in favor of personal and minority entitlements is just, in all reality not possible. The liberal Democrats just need to face up to it and start being reasonable. There are going to be REAL cuts. They will hurt but the higher taxes or reduced loopholes will hurt too. The idealistic day dream is OVER. If we go over the cliff then the “middle” and “lower” class is going to really get hurt because the “upper” class will take their money and leave the country. The 2%? If they do not want anyone to get their money they won’t. America is not the best place to do business any way. Life’s a b—-! Deal with it.

Nov 22, 2012 6:37pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Spruce wrote:
Boehner and McConnell need to start working for the benefit of the country and begin to negotiate. The obstructionism that the GOP has demonstrated over the past 2 years has done great harm to the economy. Both need to start acting like statesmen and less like hack politicians.

Nov 22, 2012 7:49pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Raelyn wrote:
Boehner is such a Tea Party puppet.. I guess all those middle class majority votes didn’t tell him anything … and with luck this will be his last term in office.

Nov 22, 2012 10:56pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.