Palestine envoy says Beijing backs U.N. entry

BEIJING Fri Nov 23, 2012 6:00am EST

Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi (R) shakes hands with Bassam Al-Salhi, envoy of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, at China's foreign ministry in Beijing November 23, 2012. REUTERS/China Daily

Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi (R) shakes hands with Bassam Al-Salhi, envoy of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, at China's foreign ministry in Beijing November 23, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/China Daily

BEIJING (Reuters) - Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas' envoy to China said on Friday that Beijing backs their United Nations membership bid, a day after France indicated it would support a diplomatic upgrade for Palestine.

Bassam al-Salhi, in China on a three-day trip to discuss tensions in Gaza, echoed earlier calls from China's Foreign Ministry that Beijing would support Palestinian statehood and its entry into the United Nations.

"They (China) support the Palestinian right for ending occupation and building a Palestinian state ..and support the bid of the Palestinian membership in the United Nations," Salhi told Reuters in an interview after meeting Chinese Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi.

China's official Xinhua new agency quoted Yang as saying China "supports Palestine's entry into the United Nations and other international organizations and understands, respects and backs Palestine's bid for the U.N. observer status".

After their drive for full U.N. membership failed in the U.N. Security Council last year amid U.S. opposition, the Palestinians have launched a watered-down bid for recognition as a "non-member state", similar to the Vatican's U.N. status.

This request can be approved by the 193-nation U.N. General Assembly and seems certain to pass.

Washington says it favors eventual statehood for the Palestinians, but wants it to come as a result of negotiations with Israel. The United States can block full recognition of Palestine as a U.N. member at the Security Council, where it has a veto.

On Thursday, French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius indicated support, reminding the French Senate of a campaign promise for international recognition of a Palestinian state made by President Francois Hollande.

Beijing has kept close ties with the Palestinians for decades, but in recent years, it has cultivated stronger relations with Israel, especially in the field of defense.

Salhi downplayed China's new ties while lashing out at the United States, saying Beijing has played an "active and vital" role on Palestine's behalf.

"We could not ask China not to make these ties (with Israel). What we need is more balance from all the international community," Salhi said, adding that Washington had "given nothing in the past 15 or 16 years".

A permanent member of the U.N. Security Council with veto powers, China has kept a low profile in Middle East diplomacy, and had little success in off-and-on attempts over the years to mediate in the Israeli-Palestinian issue.

China's Foreign Ministry has repeatedly called for both sides to resume peace talks, and said it was concerned about Israel's recent large-scale military operations around Gaza.

(Reporting by Michael Martina, Editing by Sui-Lee Wee and Jason Webb)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
rgbviews wrote:
“Washington says it favors eventual statehood for the Palestinians, but wants it to come as a result of negotiations with Israel.”

What does this seemingly harmless statement actually mean? It means that “negotiations” would be unbalanced, with Israel trading with stolen goods as its “difficult concessions” and with Israel dictating the terms of an unjust agreement. It would mean an expanded State of Israel and Israel’s control of key natural resources, totally contrary to the principles of international law. It would mean the Palestinians left with an non viable state. It would mean submission human principles to the power of money.

The US position is transparent and reveals it to be based on the objectives of AIPAC, not basic principles of the United States of America.

Nov 23, 2012 10:51am EST  --  Report as abuse
pbgd wrote:
Of course they back Palestine, and so will North Korea and Moldavia, no doubt.

Nov 23, 2012 4:48pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Spacetime wrote:
the world’s righteous people stand with the heroic Palestinian people fighting Israel killers.

Nov 24, 2012 12:48am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.