Arizona declines to set up state-based health insurance exchange

PHOENIX Wed Nov 28, 2012 5:17pm EST

Related Topics

Photo

Air strikes in Gaza

Our latest photos from the scene.   Slideshow 

PHOENIX (Reuters) - Arizona Governor Jan Brewer, an ardent critic of President Barack Obama's push to overhaul the U.S. healthcare system, said on Wednesday she was rejecting a new federal mandate to set up a state-based health insurance exchange under the U.S. Affordable Care Act.

Citing lingering unanswered questions about the exchanges and concerns about high costs she said would be passed on to Arizona families and small businesses, Brewer, a Republican, said her state would opt instead for a federally run exchange.

Such networks are designed to function as online insurance markets where consumers can shop for private coverage at federally subsidized rates, and are an integral provision of the act, a centerpiece of Obama's first term in office.

Under a newly extended deadline, states have until December 14 to notify the U.S. Health and Human Services Department whether they intend to comply with the insurance exchange mandate or leave it to the federal government to set up and operate exchanges for them.

About 17 states have told the Obama administration they plan to move ahead on their own exchanges, while at least nine Republican governors in recent days have rejected the plan outright, as Brewer has, or opted to cooperate with Washington in setting up a hybrid federal-state network.

"My opposition to the Affordable Care Act is unwavering, as is my belief that it should be repealed and replaced," Brewer said in a statement announcing her decision.

(Reporting by David Schwartz; Writing by Steve Gorman; Editing by Cynthia Johnston)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
totherepublic wrote:
If enough states do this obmamacare will be dead in the water before it gets off the ground. The Feds will not have the money to fund it…that is the plan. The best thing we can do is to get rid of this thing before it bites us in the butt and it will.

Nov 28, 2012 5:38pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Peckiro wrote:
Fine and dandy then. Let the red states do their own thing and let’s see in 2 years who is paying more for health coverage. The SCOTUS affirmed and the last election confirmed that universal health care has arrived and there is not a damned thing red states can do about it.
The majority has spoken…drop the assinine annimosity already.

Nov 28, 2012 6:17pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.