Sponsored Links

Annaly seeks to diversify as Fed's bond buying squeezes business model

Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:34am EST

Nov 29 (Reuters) - Annaly Capital Management Inc pioneered the mortgage REIT business in late 1990s, and became an instant hit with investors who enjoyed generous dividend payouts.

Now its business model, and those big dividends, are under threat from the Federal Reserve's latest round of bond buying, forcing the company to diversify by making an $840 million bid for the remainder of CreXus Investment Corp.

And with its cash hoard of $2.26 billion it may not stop there, analysts said.

Annaly typically borrows short term at low rates and buys mortgage-backed securities (MBS) guaranteed by agencies such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac that make up more than 90 percent of its portfolio.

However, the third round of quantitative easing initiated by the Fed in September to mop up $40 billion of agency mortgage backed securities every month is flattening the yield curve, compressing the company's interest rate spreads.

"What has been the best dividend game in the town is getting squeezed," Stifel Nicolaus analyst Michael Widner said.

The decision to buy the 88 percent of CreXus that it does not already own is an acknowledgment by Annaly that it needs other lines of business to create attractive risk-adjusted returns, FBR analyst Gabe Poggi said in a note to clients.

CreXus invests mainly in commercial mortgage loans and commercial mortgage-backed securities.

"The company's proposed acquisition of CXS is an admittance by NLY that its current agency MBS model cannot work in the current environment from a risk/reward perspective," Poggi said.

Annaly shares, trading at a three-year low, have fallen about 17 percent since Sept. 13, when the Fed announced its decision to buy mortgage-backed securities.

Annaly's strategy to diversify into other asset classes and its steadily falling investment income may make the stock less attractive to investors.

The company, which has a $130 billion agency mortgage-backed securities (MBS) portfolio, plans to allocate up to 25 percent of shareholders' equity to other assets.

Of 20 analysts covering the stock, 11 rate it a hold, five have a buy or strong buy, and the rest rate it a sell or strong sell, according to Thomson Reuters Starmine.

"In terms of returns or economic returns or core income, they face material pressures, and their earnings and dividends are coming down further," Macquarie Capital analyst Jasper Burch told Reuters.

Annaly reported core-spread earnings, excluding one-time gains from MBS sales, of 30 cents per share in the third quarter, well below the 50-cent dividend it paid.

The company's interest rate spread, its key profit driver, fell by a whopping 52 basis point to 1.02 percent from the prior quarter and its net interest income shrank nearly 20 percent.

The annualized dividend yield on Annaly's stock for the quarter ended Sept. 30 was 11.88 percent, based on the closing price of $16.84, compared with 14.43 percent, a year earlier.

CHIMERA A POSSIBLE TARGET

"The active involvement of policymakers in the mortgage market, particularly the Federal Reserve's latest, open-ended, large-scale asset purchase program, has introduced unique challenges for all investors," CEO Wellington Denahan-Norris said in the company's earnings release on Nov. 5.

Annaly has a market value of about $14.4 billion, well ahead of its closest rival, American Capital Agency Corp, which has a market capitalization of about $10.8 billion.

As Annaly seeks to diversify, some analysts think Chimera Investment Corp, in which Annaly already owns a 4.4 percent stake, could be its next target.

"The easiest asset class for them is residential, non-agency RMBS (residential mortgage-backed securities) and their next target could be Chimera Investment Corp, which is similar to CreXus but harder to acquire as the former has regulatory issues," Macquarie's Burch said.

Chimera, which has a market value of about $2.7 billion, is externally managed by Annaly unit Fixed Income Discount Advisory Company (FIDAC), a unit of Annaly.

However, Chimera is still working through the toxic assets it accumulated during the sub-prime boom and is in the process of restating its results for the last four years.

The company faces delisting from the New York Stock Exchange if it does not file its restated results before a Jan. 15 deadline.

"The issue right now for Chimera is that they have not published signed off financials in almost a year," said Stifel Nicolaus's Widner.

"So they certainly need to get the accounting issues straightened out at Chimera first and if they get that done then (a bid is) a possibility."

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
honkj wrote:
your article has a couple problems, Annaly’s “core” earnings.. or the thing you want to look at is 45 cents. not 30 cents.

they reported a 52 basis point decline, because they choose to buy more expensive duration for protection, some of which never even existed 3 years ago… a company that is having pressure on margins doesn’t usually choose to make it’s spread worse, unless it was confident in it’s future.

(the way to think about it is NLY has full control on those expenses that are the biggest part of that spread, the protection is chooses, and the duration it chooses. both of which they either kept the same or INCREASED…)

one doesn’t do this if they thought they didn’t have room to do it… and 25% in commercial is far more than they need to keep dividends and earnings at present levels, when they do have a couple quarters of commercial earnings they may be forced to increase dividends, because commercial paper has far less leverage needed. and there really is no such thing as a bad commercial loan now a adays.. after the near 2nd great depression wiped out anything that wasn’t absolutely profitable.

so while this quarter, and possibly next quarter will be under pressure… (not really since they will be able to sell portfolio parts at massive profits, due to the fed making their portfolio more valuable.) earnings will be of it’s and investors liking with that commercial paper. Not guaranteed like the agency paper… but hey, proper risk management is where it is at now adays anyway… and NLY has had 15 years of excellent risk management, including this recent Fed move, NLY shows they had always planned ahead by having control of commercial and non agency companies.

Nov 29, 2012 10:16am EST  --  Report as abuse
honkj wrote:
your article has a couple problems, Annaly’s “core” earnings.. or the thing you want to look at is 45 cents. not 30 cents.

they reported a 52 basis point decline, because they choose to buy more expensive duration for protection, some of which never even existed 3 years ago… a company that is having pressure on margins doesn’t usually choose to make it’s spread worse, unless it was confident in it’s future.

(the way to think about it is NLY has full control on those expenses that are the biggest part of that spread, the protection is chooses, and the duration it chooses. both of which they either kept the same or INCREASED…)

one doesn’t do this if they thought they didn’t have room to do it… and 25% in commercial is far more than they need to keep dividends and earnings at present levels, when they do have a couple quarters of commercial earnings they may be forced to increase dividends, because commercial paper has far less leverage needed. and there really is no such thing as a bad commercial loan now a adays.. after the near 2nd great depression wiped out anything that wasn’t absolutely profitable.

so while this quarter, and possibly next quarter will be under pressure… (not really since they will be able to sell portfolio parts at massive profits, due to the fed making their portfolio more valuable.) earnings will be of it’s and investors liking with that commercial paper. Not guaranteed like the agency paper… but hey, proper risk management is where it is at now adays anyway… and NLY has had 15 years of excellent risk management, including this recent Fed move, NLY shows they had always planned ahead by having control of commercial and non agency companies.

Nov 29, 2012 10:16am EST  --  Report as abuse
honkj wrote:
also your observation that NLY “might” buy Chimera is a red herring… if it isn’t worth buying, NLY will not buy it… hello? nothing is stopping NLY from buying non Agency paper right now.. without ever acquiring Chimera…

why any one would think NLY would buy Chimera is beyond silly, UNLESS of course it was a great deal, which it might be, but the people that would know is NLY, because they MANAGE THE THING…

as a matter of fact, it they do buy it, that means people were far to williing to bet that Chimera had bad portfolio, that would signal that Chimera’s portfolio is guaranteed to be a good deal.

NLY is in the driver seat… why anyone would think NLY would buy a bad asset after 15 years of showing they know what the heck they are doing, is more than a little… short sighted.

Nov 29, 2012 10:22am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.