Obama warns Syria's Assad against use of chemical weapons

WASHINGTON Mon Dec 3, 2012 4:44pm EST

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama issued a warning to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad on Monday not to use chemical weapons against Syrian opposition forces, saying there would be consequences if he were to do so.

"I want to make it absolutely clear to Assad and those under his command: The world is watching," Obama said in a speech to a gathering of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons proliferation experts.

"The use of chemical weapons is and would be totally unacceptable and if you make the tragic mistake of using these weapons, there will be consequences and you will be held accountable," Obama said.

He did not say how the United States might respond, but White House spokesman Jay Carney said earlier that "contingency planning" was under way when asked whether the use of military force was an option.

It was unclear what has motivated U.S. officials to think that Syria might be on the verge of using chemical weapons.

An American official said the United States is concerned that Syria may be preparing to combine the chemicals needed to make sarin gas.

As Assad's government has shown signs of increasing strain in response to recent advances made by the rebels, Carney said the United States has grown concerned that the Syrian president might be considering the use of chemical weapons.

This would, Carney said, "cross a red line for the United States."

Some U.S. Republicans have been critical of the Obama administration's response to the Syrian crisis as thousands of people have been killed during the country's civil war.

During the presidential campaign, Obama's Republican challenger, Mitt Romney, said the United States should facilitate the arming of Syrian rebels, a step Obama has not taken.

Obama said in his speech on Monday that the United States would continue to support the legitimate aspirations of the Syrian people, engaging with the opposition and providing them with humanitarian aid. He said his goal is a transition in Syria to a country that is free of Assad.

(Reporting By Steve Holland, Matt Spetalnick and David Alexander; Editing by Sandra Maler and Christopher Wilson)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
boonteetan wrote:
There is a possibility that Assad might use chemical weapons as the last resort at a critical stage when he is forced into a tight and helpless corner. It will change the US president’s equation. And that could be disastrous.
Would there be a preemptive action from the west? It could be equally if not more disastrous.
(vzc1943, mtd1943)

Dec 03, 2012 9:38pm EST  --  Report as abuse
mediaexposed wrote:
How do you know that this is true becuase the Government says so? The Government lied 935 times before invading Iraq. Journalist and news agencies need to question the Government more rather than just repeating what they say and spreading fear and propaganda.

Can someone in the media please try to get a direct response contact within the Syrian Government and ask them about Chemical Weapons and add their responses in your reporting everytime as a counter. That’s real journalism, giving both sides of the story and questioning what your Governemt is saying, not repeating it.

Dec 03, 2012 9:59pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.