Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Weird homes

Home is where the heart is, no matter what unusual form that home may take.  Slideshow 

Photo

The drone wars

The frontlines of America's covert drone program.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.

State governors to meet with Obama, Boehner on "fiscal cliff"

Related Topics

U.S. President Barack Obama hosts a bipartisan meeting with Congressional leaders in the Roosevelt Room of White House to discuss the economy, November 16, 2012. Left of President Obama is Speaker of the House John Boehner. REUTERS/Larry Downing

U.S. President Barack Obama hosts a bipartisan meeting with Congressional leaders in the Roosevelt Room of White House to discuss the economy, November 16, 2012. Left of President Obama is Speaker of the House John Boehner.

Credit: Reuters/Larry Downing

WASHINGTON | Tue Dec 4, 2012 10:11am EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - With a few weeks remaining before the onset of "fiscal cliff," a bipartisan delegation of governors is set to meet Tuesday with President Barack Obama and congressional leaders in search of some answers about the impact of deficit reduction measures on their state budgets, which rely heavily on federal aid.

Federal grants to the states comprise about a third of state revenues in the United States, according to the Pew Center on the States.

Cutbacks in federal contracting due to the automatic budget cuts set for January 1 will also reduce employment levels regionally, with the heaviest impact expected in areas with large numbers of defense contractors.

The governors making the rounds Tuesday, who hold leadership positions in the National Governors Association, are Democrats Jack Markell of Delaware, Mark Dayton of Minnesota and Mike Beebe of Arkansas and Republican Gary Herbert of Utah, Scott Walker of Wisconsin and Mary Fallin of Oklahoma.

The so-called fiscal cliff refers to combination of government spending cuts and tax rises due to be implemented under existing law starting New Year's Day that may cut the federal budget deficit but also tip the economy back into recession.

But with Republicans and Democrats still in preliminary stages of negotiations over how to avoid the steep tax hikes and spending cuts set for the end of the year, these NGA leaders may leave frustrated, as have numerous other delegations of civic, union and business leaders trooping to Washington in the past few months.

Republicans proposed steep spending cuts on Monday but gave no ground on Obama's call to raise taxes on the wealthiest in their first formal proposal to avert the fiscal cliff.

The White House dismissed the Republican proposal within an hour of its being made public, the same treatment Republicans gave Obama's deficit reduction plan last week.

While the offers and counteroffers between Republicans and Democrats may ultimately create the conditions for actually getting in a room together and bargaining at length, so far the moves have been out in public and mostly for show.

It's "just a Kabuki theater you go through" so far, Erskine Bowles said in an interview Monday evening on PBS' "Newshour." Bowles was co-chair with former U.S. Sen. Alan Simpson of a deficit reduction commission widely praised for its recommendations two years ago but never accepted by either party.

"They're going to have to get together at some point in time when the time is right in a conference room and go through these three big items," Bowles said.

That theater is likely to continue Tuesday when Democrats in the House of Representatives begin an effort to force a vote on tax hikes on the wealthy, over the objections of the Republican-controlled House, which is not expected to bring a bill to the floor until a bargain is struck.

Under House rules, the minority Democrats would need about 26 Republican votes to succeed with their "discharge petition," and the process takes so long that it would likely be weeks before a vote would actually take place.

"We just don't know what Washington's going to do," Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin told The Oklahoman on the eve of her departure for Washington

The city is now awash in competing plans to cut the exploding Federal deficit.

A think tank with ties to the Obama administration laid out another one Tuesday, urging the president to go bold and seek more concessions from Republicans on tax hikes.

The $4.1 trillion deficit-cutting plan from the Center for American Progress seeks $1.8 trillion in new revenue, compared with Obama's call to raise $1.6 trillion.

It also calls for a 28 percent tax on capital gains income for high earners, whereas Obama has called for about a 24 percent tax rate, including new taxes from the healthcare overhaul.

(Editing by W Simon)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (5)
Stickystones wrote:
The states need to raise their tax rates and spending to offset the federal grants. This has been part of the problem for many years and the President’s proposals only make it worse. The federal government is much less efficient than most state governments and the feds tell the states where and how they can spend their money. The federal government know no bounds to expansion and doesn’t balance the budget, states must balance their budgets ultimately and are more responsive to their citizens. The framers of this country consciously made a decision to limit the federal powers in order to diffuse power from a central entity. Their fears have been realized now 200+ years later by the resurgence of Federalism. As the adage states ‘those who forget history are doomed to repeat it’. Most people don’t even realize the US is a Republic and why we have a electoral college – it’s all about state rights because the people who established this country so feared a central government without checks and balances.

Dec 04, 2012 9:05am EST  --  Report as abuse
M.C.McBride wrote:
Employment matters more than the deficit. Income stability also matters more than the deficit to the long term prosperity of the nation. Create and save some jobs, please, Washington politicians.

Dec 04, 2012 10:00am EST  --  Report as abuse
flashrooster wrote:
Stickystones: The problem with what you’re suggesting is that it’s the poorest states, mostly the southern states, that get the most from the feds. Those states would have to raise an awful lot of taxes to make up for the lack of federal assistance, and they just don’t have the wealth. Income disparity is even greater in those states than elsewhere. (In fact, if the Republicans have their way, the south represents the future of our entire country.) And if you raise taxes too much, depending on whom you raise them on, the poor grow poorer (and often that’s not possible) and the rich move out of state. It’s much simpler for a wealthy person to move to another state than another country. Where else can the get away without paying taxes, have the security they have here in the US, and be able to control the government?

Dec 04, 2012 12:25pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.