After meeting Obama, governors urge resolution of fiscal impasse

WASHINGTON Tue Dec 4, 2012 5:45pm EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democratic and Republican governors urged the White House and Congress on Tuesday to reach a deal to avoid year-end tax hikes and spending cuts, but they did not publicly recommend how the sides should bridge differences.

"We're not saying it should be this plan or that plan, I think what we all agree on is something's got to get done," Delaware Governor Jack Markell told reporters after meeting with President Barack Obama at the White House.

"And the idea that taxes on so many middle-class Americans could go up at the beginning of the year if something isn't done is something that could really negatively impact the economies in all of our states," added Markell, a Democrat, who is chair of the National Governors Association.

Obama and congressional Republicans are trying to work out a way to avoid automatic, across-the-board tax increases and government spending cuts that analysts say would drag the economy back into a recession. The president insists on letting tax cuts for top earners enacted under President George W. Bush expire as part of the deal.

Republicans have balked at tax rate increases. They have proposed increasing revenue through eliminating deductions and loopholes.

As part of his campaign to pressure Congress, Obama has met with a range of interest groups, and the governors are his latest guests at the White House. Markell was joined by two fellow Democrats and three Republicans at the White House on Tuesday.

Obama is due to speak to corporate leaders who are part of the Business Roundtable on Wednesday.

The governors told reporters after the meeting that the apparent stalemate between avoiding the fiscal cliff is casting a pall over business investment and hiring.

"What people are concerned about is the uncertainty that the current state of the debate represents in terms to businesses and individuals across the country," Markell said.

"The sooner that this gets resolved, and we believe the sooner that this gets resolved - that's not a three month fix, but that's a fix for some longer period of time - the better off we will be."

Many states are still dealing with budget shortfalls after a wrenching downturn, and the shock of going over the so-called fiscal cliff could be a painful setback, the governors said.

"This is a very serious time for our nation, a very serious time for our individual states, especially as we are recovering from the 2008 downturn," said Oklahoma Governor Mary Fallin, a Republican.

(Additional reporting by Jeff Mason, Matt Spetalnick, Steve Holland, and Lisa Lambert; Editing by Stacey Joyce)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
alienzed wrote:
Rich people getting richer doesn’t help the economy, it just supports the false notion that the economy does well when the rich do well.
The ‘job creators’ won’t hire more employees if taxes go down; that concept is flawed to it’s core. The rich got rich precisely by squeezing their businesses and short changing their employees as much as they possibly could, by denying benefits, cutting hours, etc…
What grows the economy are people with money to buy material things, as sad as that is. More buying power means the job creators will NEED to hire more workers, otherwise they would be losing out on profit, which is all that matters to them. If you want to help the economy, make it harder for the rich to get even richer and they’ll actually HAVE to invest in their business for competitive reasons… Capitalism was never about hoarding cash, it was about efficiency and innovation through competition and there’s no competition when companies get legal monopolies (patents, copyrights) or when the middle class are too poor to buy anything anyway.

Dec 04, 2012 6:34pm EST  --  Report as abuse
IfOnlyYouKnew wrote:
I own a small business and if the government would offer a creative tax break such as, all business don’t have to match payroll taxes on the first five employees we would hire two additional fulltime employees. This would equate to additional payers instead of takers.

Dec 04, 2012 8:36pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.