White House dismisses Republican "fiscal cliff" proposal

WASHINGTON Tue Dec 4, 2012 11:58am EST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The White House dismissed a "fiscal cliff" proposal from congressional Republicans on Monday that included tax reforms and spending cuts, saying it did not meet President Barack Obama's pledge to raise taxes on the wealthiest Americans.

"The Republican letter released today does not meet the test of balance. In fact, it actually promises to lower rates for the wealthy and sticks the middle class with the bill," White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer said in a statement.

He was referring to a proposal laid out in a letter by House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner and other Republicans.

"Their plan includes nothing new and provides no details on which deductions they would eliminate, which loopholes they will close or which Medicare savings they would achieve," Pfeiffer said.

"Independent analysts who have looked at plans like this one have concluded that middle-class taxes will have to go up to pay for lower rates for millionaires and billionaires."

Boehner proposed overhauling the U.S. tax code to raise $800 billion in new revenue over ten years. Obama's opening bid, outlined on Capitol Hill on Friday, seeks $1.6 trillion in new revenue by allowing the expiry of tax cuts enacted under President George W. Bush for the top two tax brackets.

After winning re-election last month with a campaign pledge to raise tax rates for the wealthiest Americans, Obama will not agree to extend the Bush-era tax cuts for the richest 2 percent of U.S. households, senior administration officials said.

The officials said the White House would likely continue to discuss ways to avert the "fiscal cliff" in phone calls with their negotiating counterparts in Congress.

Some conversations might take place at the White House's annual holiday party on Monday night, they said.

But after the Republicans made an offer that runs counter to Obama' main demand for higher tax rates, the officials said they believe it is now up to congressional Republicans to take steps to advance negotiations.

Once Republicans agree that tax rates must rise, achieving a broader deal to reduce the budget deficit will be much easier, the officials said.

(Additional reporting by Mark Felsenthal, Editing by Sandra Maler and Christopher Wilson)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (6)
altalks21 wrote:
If we want the gov.t to spend less on entitlements, then let’s get the super rich & their large corporations off of government welfare, take away all their tax breaks & tax loopholes & other entitlements & let our American Capitalist FREE MARKET determine their fate.

Dec 03, 2012 9:00pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Obsilutely wrote:
altalks21, I agree. Let’s also cut some of this ridiculous military spending. Send in real analysts who will find out why contractors bloat their proposals and hold them accountable for their ridiculous costs.

Dec 03, 2012 9:58pm EST  --  Report as abuse
beofaction wrote:
Judging by the previous two comments, the Democrats are succeeding in their propaganda war. First of all, corporations don’t ever really pay taxes. The users of their goods and services pay the taxes – and if the corporation cannot pass on the cost of the government tax or regulation they reduce expenses which often means layoffs. It’s just another one of the long list of lies Democrats have used to attract the votes from the very same people they are hurting. The second lie is that the wealthy don’t “pay their fair share” of taxes, when in fact the top 5% pay almost 60% of all income taxes. You can find the info on the IRS web site – or you can continue to be like sheep heading to the slaughter while voting for those that will slaughter you!

Dec 03, 2012 10:13pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.