Norquist won't oppose Republicans wobbly on taxes, yet

WASHINGTON Tue Dec 11, 2012 1:10am EST

Grover Norquist, founder of the taxpayer advocacy group, Americans for Tax Reform (ATR), adjusts his glasses as he speaks during the Reuters Washington Summit in Washington June 27, 2012. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas

Grover Norquist, founder of the taxpayer advocacy group, Americans for Tax Reform (ATR), adjusts his glasses as he speaks during the Reuters Washington Summit in Washington June 27, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Yuri Gripas

Related Topics


Air strikes in Gaza

Our latest photos from the scene.   Slideshow 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republican lawmakers who publicly mull acquiescing to tax increases on the wealthiest Americans may be guilty of "impure thoughts" in the words of anti-tax crusader Grover Norquist, but he says that alone is no reason to throw them out of office.

"Thinking something out loud is not treason," Norquist, the president of Americans for Tax Reform, told Reuters in an interview.

Senators Bob Corker of Tennessee and Saxby Chambliss of Georgia, and Representative Tom Cole of Oklahoma are among a handful of Republicans openly weighing President Barack Obama's proposal to raise tax rates on household incomes above $250,000, the stickiest point in the talks to avert the "fiscal cliff."

"Right now, he has had impure thoughts on tax increases," Norquist said of the recent comments by Chambliss. "But nobody has voted for a tax increase."

Obama and U.S. House of Representatives Speaker John Boehner met on Sunday in negotiations on a potential deal, about three weeks before some $600 billion in tax increases and spending cuts begin to kick in, possibly igniting another recession.

Asked about Republicans giving in on taxes, Norquist said: "It may be unhelpful, it may be throwing marbles at Boehner's feet, but I think they are trying to be helpful."

Norquist's famed "Taxpayer Protection Pledge," signed by nearly every Republican lawmaker in the House and Senate, holds that they not raise taxes. Support has appeared to wane amid a drive to reduce deficits topping $1 trillion and with pressure from the latest fiscal standoff.

Lawmakers who sign the pledge vow to oppose any efforts to boost marginal individual and corporate income tax rates and to "oppose any net reduction or elimination of deductions and credits, unless matched dollar for dollar by further reducing tax rates."

Corker said on Sunday the party might be forced to give in to Obama on higher tax rates on wealthier individuals. Opinion polls show the public would tend to blame Republicans if the country falls off the fiscal cliff.

"There is a growing group of folks who are ... realizing that we don't have a lot of cards as it relates to the tax issue before year-end," Corker told the "Fox News Sunday" program.

Despite such statements, Norquist said it was too early to think about supporting more-conservative candidates to challenge lawmakers who seem to stray from the pledge.

Of Corker's comments, Norquist lamented that no one pays attention to the spending cuts the senator has proposed.

"All the advocates of bigger government hear is Corker will vote for a tax increase," Norquist said.


Norquist said Republicans do hold leverage - in their power to hold up approval of a hike in the government's borrowing limit - known as the debt ceiling. They also have the power to hold up approval of the so-called Continuing Resolution that funds the government.

If necessary, Norquist said, Republicans should only agree to the extension of these two levers every few weeks or once a month to extract spending cuts.

Political wrangling over the debt limit in 2011, including Republican demands for spending cuts in exchange for a debt limit increase, led Standard & Poor's to downgrade the U.S. debt rating for the first time in the country's history.

The existing Continuing Resolution expires at the end of March. The government is expected to run into its borrowing limit at year's end but has a few months of breathing room to shift funds around before it actually runs out of money.

Norquist's group, despite having more "non-signers" of the pledge in the Congress that will be seated in January than in the current group of lawmakers, spent about $25 million in the most recent election cycle, a record.

The group does not need to disclose its donors under tax laws, but Norquist said there are "more than 100,000 members."

Norquist, who began ATR in the mid-1980s, said he did not have enough details to evaluate whether Boehner's initial offer to raise $800 billion in revenue through unspecified closing of tax deductions and loopholes violated the "pledge."

He said he understood the offer is made "in the context of reducing marginal tax rates and broadening the base ... and economic growth."

(Reporting by Kim Dixon; Editing by Howard Goller and Eric Beech)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see
Comments (52)
mobytheminnow wrote:
Grover Norquist should be in jail. He is interfering in the collection of taxes and because of him the rich have been taking and taking and then when the poor have nothing but the rich have their big pile of money they say so what?

Dec 11, 2012 1:29am EST  --  Report as abuse
jcfl wrote:
how do we allow one guy who’s never produced one dime of marketable goods (spell that a real job) who has 100,000 (by his account) unnamed people with unknown motives backing him with unknown amounts of money control anyone in congress to the point where they will harm the united states? i can’t even fathom how disgusting this situation is. it is literally joe mccarthy all over again. at what point do we send this creaton to the rubbish pile where he belongs?

Dec 11, 2012 7:11am EST  --  Report as abuse
BillDexter wrote:
At the moment, Grover Norquist and the Tea Party stand as channel markers that show just how far off course our country has drifted. The outrage and repulsion that liberals express in general these days and at this guy in particular has taken on a life of it’s own.

Young people may never have been told, but some of you older people remember that when this country was founded, the premise of government was that it was to be forever limited, with the functions of legislative, executive and judicial clearly divided. The history of the USA has been the growth of government and in particular the federal government for various reasons and to various effects, but that’s NOT how the thing started.

Today, we stand on verge of Obamacare. The idea that government is to ‘provide’ healthcare is a natural progression of the ‘welfare’ state, but it is so very far from the founding principle of government. We are supposed to be self determining citizens.

Sadly, the problem that Obamacare is supposed to fix is the grotesque regulatory quagmire that grew as government grew itself into ‘healthcare’ in the first place. Mr. Norquist’s effort pains us because we don’t want to be reminded that we are fixing the cost of public policy with more public spending policy. We don’t want to be reminded that it can’t work, we just want our next fix of other people’s money.

Dec 11, 2012 8:14am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.