"Fiscal cliff" outcome still uncertain; talks continue

WASHINGTON Tue Dec 11, 2012 6:52am EST

1 of 3. U.S. President Barack Obama hosts a bipartisan meeting with Congressional leaders in the Roosevelt Room of White House to discuss the economy, November 16, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Larry Downing

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - As the pace of talks quickened to avert the "fiscal cliff" of steep tax hikes and spending cuts set for the end of the year, senior members of the U.S. House of Representatives of both parties cautioned that an agreement on all the outstanding issues remained uncertain.

Republicans and Democrats are not close to "finishing anything," California Representative Kevin McCarthy, the Republican whip in the House, told Fox News Monday night.

"There's nothing agreed to. They are just beginning to talk," he said of House Speaker John Boehner and President Barack Obama.

Meanwhile, Representative Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee, said on MSNBC Monday he thought Congress could resolve some of the issues by the December 31 deadline -- among them the hikes in tax rates-but might have to leave others for the new Congress that takes office in January.

The two major elements of the so-called cliff are automatic spending reductions set to occur starting January 1 and tax cuts that expire at the end of the year. Democrats, including Obama, want the reduced taxes extended for all but the highest earners, while Republicans want them continued for all brackets.

Also in the mix is a payroll tax "holiday" set to expire, which, if not extended, will could quickly reduce the take-home pay of a large segment of the U.S. workforce.

The holiday, now in its second year, has been providing workers with an average of about $1,000 a year in extra cash. Significant divisions remain on the payroll tax question in part because it funds the Social Security retirement program.

The payroll tax, dedicated to financing Social Security, is paid by employers and employees at a rate of 6.2 percent of wages up to a maximum of $110,110. The holiday, enacted in 2010, reduced the rate by 2 percentage points on the portion paid by the worker.

Van Hollen said Republicans were coming around on the tax hikes, and said there was a good chance of resolving that soon.

Other things might have to wait, he said, mentioning the budget cuts, or "sequestration," and the payroll tax.

If not complete by January 1, he said, "my belief is you would get it done very soon" after the New Year, noting that the government has some flexibility on withholding taxes that could limit the immediate hit to taxpayers while negotiations continued into 2013.

There were no travel plans Tuesday on the public schedule of President Barack Obama, which observers on Capitol Hill hoped signaled more negotiations.

(Reporting by Fred Barbash Editing by W Simon)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (2)
milanzm wrote:
Do NOT forget that Obama and Boehner are golf buddies…Unfortunately, “Last minute deal” in Congress, with mutual compromise, we already saw so many times during last 4 years ( it become part of Washington “middle ground” Political “game”)…I am optimist about ‘fiscal cliff’…

Dec 11, 2012 10:55am EST  --  Report as abuse
brotherkenny4 wrote:
The reason we are here now is because none of our congress people can do anything without considering their own future prospects in elections. Well, that and they need to check with the money guys that put them in. I would prefer the “fiscal cliff” to another weak compromise by congress. However, I expect that they will find a “compromise” that loads down everyone except the wealthy and the military industries. And again, likely to blame the poor for being poor, like our heroic leaders tend to do. What great americans are our leaders as they stand supported by the wealthy and defend them against the poor and suffering. Why don’t we just cut to the chase and have everyone who is not a millionaire put into chains and treated like the slaves that they are and always have been.

Dec 11, 2012 12:39pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

Recommended Newsletters

Reuters U.S. Top News
A quick-fix on the day's news published with Reuters videos and award-winning news photography and delivered at your choice of one of four times during the day.
Reuters Deals Today
The latest Reuters articles on M&A, IPOs, private equity, hedge funds and regulatory updates delivered to your inbox each day.
Reuters Technology Report
Your daily briefing on the latest tech developments from around the world from Reuters expert tech correspondents.