It's OK to crank up the music, Florida Supreme Court rules

TALLAHASSEE, Florida Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:04pm EST

Photo

How do I look?

Famous faces caught sneaking a peek in the mirror or applying a little makeup.  Slideshow 

TALLAHASSEE, Florida (Reuters) - Motorist Richard Catalano's five-year quest to crank up Justin Timberlake tunes on his way to work won the blessing of the Florida Supreme Court on Thursday.

In a unanimous ruling, the state's highest court affirmed a pair of lower-court opinions that a 2007 state law prohibiting loud music while driving violated the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of expression.

Catalano received a $73 ticket in 2007 for violating the newly enacted law that prohibited motorists from playing music that is "plainly audible" 25 feet away. Motorists traveling by hospitals, schools and churches were subjected to even stricter standards.

Catalano, a Clearwater lawyer, challenged the law as subjective, arguing that determining whether music was too loud was in the ears of the beholder.

Further, the law provides listeners with fewer protections than drivers of vehicles emitting political or commercial speech, who have more explicit protections under the U.S. Constitution.

Calling the law overly broad, Justice Jorge Labarga wrote that noncommercial speech was also protected. Though rejecting the notion that the law was too vague, Labarga said the state showed no compelling interest in muzzling audiophiles who also prefer to feel their favorite music.

"The right to play music, including amplified music, in public fora is protected under the First Amendment," Labarga wrote.

A message left with Catalano was not immediately returned Thursday.

(Editing by Jane Sutton; Editing by Will Dunham)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (3)
I like to listen to loud music while driving,especially in the highway but I lower the volume when I drive in residential areas. I hate it when I’m trying to sleep after a long day, and some rude person blasts loud music at midnight.So, the ruling basically leaves it to the discretion of the person not to be a jerk.

Dec 13, 2012 11:43pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Urada wrote:
It’s rude, pure and simple, to have your music blasting so people hear you coming before they see you. Everybody in the world doesn’t want to hear your music. Being forced to listen to someone else’s music that you don’t like is an invasion of your privacy. It’s just rude, inconsiderate, and just plain stupid. People who do this obviously think they’re so important they can do whatever they want.

Dec 14, 2012 7:17am EST  --  Report as abuse
muglet wrote:
So, we’re stopped at a light. He is 5 cars behind me and I have to subject to being assaulted with his window-rattling “music” or turn my own up fit to blow my ears out so I can hear what I am trying to listen to?

Dec 17, 2012 1:12am EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.