Photo

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

Photo

Rebel fighter training

Training new recruits to Congo's M23 insurgent group.  Slideshow 

Photo

Venezuela's toilet paper shortage

Supplies of food and other basic products have been patchy in recent months.  Slideshow 

Sponsored Links

Georgia, Russia tiptoe toward partial restoration of ties

Related Topics

TBILISI | Sat Dec 15, 2012 10:58am EST

TBILISI (Reuters) - Russia and Georgia set out a blueprint for the partial restoration of ties at their first direct talks about bilateral relations since the former Soviet republics fought a five-day war in 2008, the Georgian negotiator said on Saturday.

Russia and Georgia severed diplomatic ties due to the war, which followed years of tension over Moscow's support for two rebel regions and Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili's drive to bring his nation into NATO, and trade all but dried up.

Georgian Prime Minister Bidzina Ivanishvili, whose coalition beat Saakashvili's long-ruling party in an October 1 parliamentary election, says he wants to mend ties with Moscow while maintaining warm relations with the United States and Europe.

"We defined those issues that we plan to start negotiations about: trade, humanitarian and cultural ties and restoration of regular flights between the two countries," Zurab Abashidze, Ivanishvili's envoy for relations with Russia, told reporters.

At the meeting on Friday, held in Geneva and mediated by Switzerland, the countries agreed to continue talks on regular basis, he said.

The Russian Foreign Ministry said the representatives "exchanged views on possible ways to normalize relations between Russian and Georgia in specific spheres."

Georgia is eager to revive trade with Russia, which banned imports of Georgian wine and mineral water, two of its main products, as tensions increased two years before the war.

Restoration of diplomatic ties is not yet on the agenda, and Russia has made clear it will give no ground on the issue of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, two breakaway Georgian regions it recognized as independent nations after the war.

Russian forces crushed a Georgian assault on South Ossetia in August 2008 and drove toward Tbilisi, pulling back after a cease-fire brokered by the European Union. Each accuses the other of starting the conflict.

Russia and Georgia have held talks in recent years on issues related to Russia's entry into the World Trade Organisation and to the breakaway regions, but not on bilateral ties.

(Reporting by Margarita Antidze; Editing by Steve Gutterman and Jason Webb)

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
DeanMJackson wrote:
Ladies and gentlemen, as I’ve already said many times here at Reuters, the “collapse” of the USSR was a strategic ruse under the “Long-Range Policy” or LRP (the “new” strategy all Communist nations signed onto in 1960 to defeat the West), which means conflicts between “former” Soviet republics (or between “former” East Bloc nations, or parts of East Bloc nations, as in the “Bosnia Crisis”, 1992 – 2001) must be analyzed under a Marxist interpretation.

That means such conflicts are supposed to either (1) convince the West that the “former” Soviet Empire is truly fractured even if the West didn’t believe in the “collapse” of the USSR. In other words, Georgia may still be run by Communists, as the West knows, but they are no longer united with Russia under the LRP; (2) motivate the West to support one country economically, in this case Georgia, which wouldn’t be the case if there wasn’t a “split” between Georgia and Russia; and (3) a combination of 1 and 2.

One must analyze everything coming out of the “former” USSR/East Bloc under the knowledge that Marxists are still in control there, and that the prime directive in this present historical era for all Marxists is the defeat of the West.

Dec 16, 2012 3:18am EST  --  Report as abuse
NeilMcGowan wrote:
DeanMJackson

How do you get an internet connection in the Mental Hospital where you live??

You are a worthless Cold Warrior lunatic and you should be stopped from posting on this website.

Dec 17, 2012 5:45am EST  --  Report as abuse
Georgian wrote:
To Reuters. The only thing Georgia and Georgians are extreamly eagered to JOIN are NATO and the EU. If the former refuses to accept Georgia, it will only be fair for Georgia to gravitate towards Moscow. That is something west must decide, weather they want Georgia in the union or they will keep relations with Georgia as with an unwanted child who eventually is lost for its own good. It’s not fair to refuse Georgia NATO membership while accepting Turkey as a NATO member in 1956. I bet you Georgia was lot more democratic in 2008 than Turkey was in 1956 when it was accepted in NATO or Imagine a post Natzi Germany demanding Georgia to be more democratic as a precondition to join the military allience NATO that is. I am doomed. The only other reason I can think of is the west (USA mainly) used Georgia as a non NAto member (to avoid being drugged into the conflict with Russia) to punish Russia for its foreign policy. Georgians in this case must realise the fairness of such an act and do what they must to avoid being ginipigs or being used in the future. We have to learn from our mistakes what has happened is clear.

Dec 17, 2012 5:29pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.