After Newtown school shooting, more Americans back tough gun laws

WASHINGTON Mon Dec 17, 2012 5:47pm EST

A Glock handgun available in a raffle promotion is shown at Adventures Outdoors in Smyrna, Georgia, October 25, 2012. REUTERS/Tami Chappell

A Glock handgun available in a raffle promotion is shown at Adventures Outdoors in Smyrna, Georgia, October 25, 2012.

Credit: Reuters/Tami Chappell

Related Topics

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The percentage of Americans favoring tough gun regulations rose significantly after the mass killings at a Connecticut elementary school last Friday, a Reuters/Ipsos poll said on Monday.

The poll found that 50 percent of those surveyed after the shootings agreed that "gun ownership should have strong regulations or restrictions." Among those surveyed before the killings the number was 42 percent.

The percentages of Americans favoring background checks on gun buyers and limits on the sales of automatic weapons also increased after the shootings, according the poll.

For the survey, 1,395 people were interviewed online from December 11-13, before the shootings. Another 1,198 people were surveyed after the shootings, from December 14-17.

Twenty children aged 6 or 7 and six adults were killed in the slaughter at the Sandy Hook Elementary school in Newtown, Connecticut. Two more adults also died - the mother of the 20-year-old gunman and the gunman himself, who authorities said shot himself as police responding to reports of gunfire converged on the school.

The massacre has led President Barack Obama and some congressional leaders to reconsider what has been a largely hands-off approach to gun control in recent years. Obama and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a fellow Democrat who has been reluctant to back gun restrictions, have said that more must be done to prevent such tragedies.

The Reuters/Ipsos survey found that the percentage of Americans who strongly supported "laws requiring background checks before allowing the sale of a firearm," rose by 7 points, from 77 percent before the shootings to 84 percent afterward.

The percentage who strongly supported "laws limiting the sale of automatic weapons (such as machine guns)," increased by 6 points, from 54 percent before the shootings to 60 percent afterward.

Adam Lanza, the gunman in the school shootings, carried three guns, including a semi-automatic rifle.

U.S. lawmakers have not approved a major new federal gun law since 1994, and a ban on certain semi-automatic rifles known as assault weapons expired in 2004.

The questions polled before the shootings had a credibility interval, which is similar to a margin of error, of plus or minus 3 percentage points. Those done after the shootings had a credibility interval of plus or minus 3.2 points. (Editing by David Lindsey and Jackie Frank)

FILED UNDER:
We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (28)
StigTW wrote:
All this gun control talk is probably sending sales through the roof

Dec 17, 2012 7:59pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Macedonian wrote:
Guns are part of the American history but were not associated with cases like this untill recent years so the question is if the guns are the real problem or there is something else. Could it be the downturn of our economy as a main cause. This case as the otherones are failure of the society. For example in China every couple of months some mentaly distressed person walks into a kindergarten and stabs kids with a kitchen knife so does China needs tougher kitchen knife laws ?

Dec 17, 2012 8:36pm EST  --  Report as abuse
Fairness101 wrote:
Well, there are aggressive people and wackos everywhere in the world. Wackos tend to just pick up any kind of readily available disaster tool. So,in a gun-restricted country a wacko would drive his car into a crowd or attack people with a knife, in the US the wacko would use a machine gun. That’s why it is more dangerous at a school in the US than for example a school in Spain or Germany. As long as guns are close to unrestricted, danger remains. There have already been various other heavily armed wackos since last Thursday with plans.

Dec 17, 2012 9:00pm EST  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.